Abstract:No AccessEngineering NoteImproving Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization by Adjoint Estimation with Shape-Based PathFanghua Jiang, Gao Tang and Junfeng LiFanghua JiangTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People’s Republic of China*Associate Professor, School of Aerospace Engineering; . Senior Member AIAA (Corresponding Author).Search for more papers by this author, Gao TangTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People’s Republic of China†Master’s Student, School of Aerospace Engineering; currently Ph.D. Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, Duke University; .Search for more papers by this author and Junfeng LiTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People’s Republic of China‡Professor, School of Aerospace Engineering; .Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:2 Aug 2017https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002803SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Hellín X. L., “Study of Earth-to-Mars Transfers with Low-Thrust Propulsion,” Polytechnic Univ. of Catalonia, School of Industrial and Aeronautical Engineering, Project Rept., Terrassa, Spain, Sept. 2011. Google Scholar[2] Betts J. T., “Survey of Numerical Methods for Trajectory Optimization,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1998, pp. 193–207. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4231 LinkGoogle Scholar[3] Casalino L., “Approximate Optimization of Low-Thrust Transfers Between Low-Eccentricity Close Orbits,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2014, pp. 1003–1008. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.62046 LinkGoogle Scholar[4] Gatto G. and Casalino L., “Fast Evaluation and Optimization of Low-Thrust Transfers to Multiple Targets,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 38, No. 8, 2015, pp. 1525–1530. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001116 LinkGoogle Scholar[5] Zhao S. G., Gurfil P. and Zhang J. R., “Initial Costates for Low-Thrust Minimum-Time Station Change of Geostationary Satellites,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 12, 2016, pp. 2746–2756. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000431 LinkGoogle Scholar[6] Dixon L. C. W. and Biggs M. C., “The Advantages of Adjoint-Control Transformations When Determining Optimal Trajectories by Pontryagin’s Maximum Principle,” Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 76, No. 735, 1972, pp. 169–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000042731 Google Scholar[7] Russell R. P., “Primer Vector Theory Applied to Global Low-Thrust Trade Studies,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2007, pp. 460–472. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.22984 LinkGoogle Scholar[8] Guo T. D., Jiang F. H. and Li J. F., “Homotopic Approach and Pseudospectral Method Applied Jointly to Low Thrust Trajectory Optimization,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 71, Feb.–March 2012, pp. 38–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.08.008 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[9] Petropoulos A. E. and Longuski J. M., “Shape-Based Algorithm for the Automated Design of Low-Thrust, Gravity-Assist Trajectories,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2004, pp. 787–796. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.13095 LinkGoogle Scholar[10] Wall B. J. and Conway B. A., “Shape-Based Approach to Low-Thrust Rendezvous Trajectory Design,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2009, pp. 95–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.36848 LinkGoogle Scholar[11] Gondelach D. J. and Noomen R., “Hodographic-Shaping Method for Low-Thrust Interplanetary Trajectory Design,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2015, pp. 728–738. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A32991 LinkGoogle Scholar[12] Taheri E. and Abdelkhalik O., “Initial Three-Dimensional Low-Thrust Trajectory Design,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 57, No. 3, 2016, pp. 889–903. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.11.034 Google Scholar[13] Taheri E., Li N. I. and Kolmanovsky I., “Co-State Initialization for the Minimum-Time Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 59, No. 9, 2017, pp. 2360–2373. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.02.010 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[14] Taheri E., Li N. I. and Kolmanovsky I., “Co-States Initialization of Minimum-Time Low-Thrust Trajectories Using Shape-Based Methods,” American Control Conference (ACC), IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, July 2016, pp. 4053–4058. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2016.7525558 Google Scholar[15] Jiang F. H., Baoyin H. X. and Li J. F., “Practical Techniques for Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization with Homotopic Approach,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2012, pp. 245–258. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.52476 LinkGoogle Scholar[16] Tang G. and Jiang F. H., “Capture of Near-Earth Objects with Low-Thrust Propulsion and Invariant Manifolds,” Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 361, No. 1, 2016, Paper 10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-015-2592-0 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[17] Lewallen J. M., Schwausch O. A. and Tapley B. D., “Coordinate System Influence on the Regularized Trajectory Optimization Problem,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1971, pp. 15–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/3.30211 LinkGoogle Scholar[18] Ranieri C. L. and Ocampo C. A., “Indirect Optimization of Spiral Trajectories,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2006, pp. 1360–1366. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.19539 LinkGoogle Scholar[19] Jiang F. H. and Tang G., “Systematic Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization for a Multi-Rendezvous Mission Using Adjoint Scaling,” Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 361, No. 4, 2016, Paper 117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-016-2704-5 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[20] Bertrand R. and Epenoy R., “New Smoothing Techniques for Solving Bang–Bang Optimal Control Problems Numerical Results and Statistical Interpretation,” Optimal Control Applications and Methods, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2002, pp. 171–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/oca.709 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[21] More J. J., Garbow B. S. and Hillstrom K. E., “User Guide for MinPack-1,” Argonne National Lab. Rept. ANL-80-74, Lemont, IL, 1980; also https://github.com/devernay/cminpack [retrieved 10 Dec. 2012]. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[22] Novak D. M. and Vasile M., “Improved Shaping Approach to the Preliminary Design of Low-Thrust Trajectories,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2011, pp. 128–147. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.50434 LinkGoogle Scholar[23] Xie C., Zhang G. and Zhang Y., “Shaping Approximation for Low-Thrust Trajectories with Large Out-of-Plane Motion,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 12, 2016, pp. 2780–2789. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001795 LinkGoogle Scholar[24] Popescu M., “Applications of Canonical Transformations in Optimizing Orbital Transfers,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1997, pp. 774–779. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4112 LinkGoogle Scholar[25] Wall B. J. and Novak D. M., “A 3D Shape-Based Approximation Method for Low-Thrust Trajectory Design,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 142, Jan. 2012, pp. 1163–1176; also American Astronomical Soc. Paper 11-479, 2011. Google Scholar[26] Kluever C. A., “Efficient Computation of Optimal Interplanetary Trajectories Using Solar Electric Propulsion,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 38, No. 5, 2014, pp. 821–830. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000144 LinkGoogle Scholar[27] Taheri E., Kolmanovsky I. and Atkins E., “Enhanced Smoothing Technique for Indirect Optimization of Minimum-Fuel Low-Thrust Trajectories,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 11, 2016, pp. 2500–2511. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000379 LinkGoogle Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byExploiting Scaling Constants to Facilitate the Convergence of Indirect Trajectory Optimization Methods12 February 2023 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 8GTOC 11: Results from Tsinghua University and Shanghai Institute of Satellite EngineeringActa Astronautica, Vol. 202Atlas of Optimal Low-Thrust Rephasing Solutions in Circular OrbitDi Wu, Xiang Guo , Fanghua Jiang and Hexi Baoyin23 December 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 0, No. 0Rapid optimization of continuous trajectory for multi-target exploration propelled by electric sailsAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 129Analytical Costate Estimation by a Reference Trajectory-Based Least-Squares MethodDi Wu, Lin Cheng , Fanghua Jiang and Junfeng Li31 March 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 8Fast costate estimation for indirect trajectory optimization using Bezier-curve-based shaping approachAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 126Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Optimal Planar Orbit TransfersEnrico Schiassi, Andrea D’Ambrosio , Kristofer Drozd , Fabio Curti and Roberto Furfaro 4 January 2022 | Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 59, No. 3Efficient optimization method for variable-specific-impulse low-thrust trajectories with shutdown constraint7 February 2022 | Science China Technological Sciences, Vol. 65, No. 3Analytical shaping method for low-thrust rendezvous trajectory using cubic spline functionsActa Astronautica, Vol. 72High-precision shape approximation low-thrust trajectory optimization method satisfying bi-objective indexChinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 35, No. 1Analytic Costate Initialization from Rough State-Trajectory EstimatesEmmanuel E. Skamangas, John A. Lawton and Jonathan T. Black6 September 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 12Minimum-time low-thrust many-revolution geocentric trajectories with analytical costates initializationAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 119A New 3D Shaping Method for Low-Thrust Trajectories between Non-Intersect Orbits24 October 2021 | Aerospace, Vol. 8, No. 11Fuel-Optimal Spacecraft Cluster Flight Around an Ellipsoidal AsteroidWei Wang, Di Wu, Hanlun Lei and Hexi Baoyin7 July 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 10Rapid generation of low-thrust many-revolution earth-center trajectories based on analytical state-based controlActa Astronautica, Vol. 187Warm Start for Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization via Switched SystemDi Wu, Fanghua Jiang and Junfeng Li21 June 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 9A homotopy approach connecting time-optimal with fuel-optimal trajectories19 January 2021 | Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 366, No. 1Warm-Start Multihomotopic Optimization for Low-Thrust Many-Revolution TrajectoriesIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 56, No. 6Efficient Computation of Optimal Low Thrust Gravity Perturbed Orbit Transfers14 May 2019 | The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 67, No. 2Optimization of Variable-Specific-Impulse Gravity-Assist TrajectoriesZhemin Chi, Di Wu, Fanghua Jiang and Junfeng Li14 November 2019 | Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 57, No. 2Multi-revolution low-thrust trajectory optimization using symplectic methods31 December 2019 | Science China Technological Sciences, Vol. 63, No. 3Deep networks as approximators of optimal low-thrust and multi-impulse cost in multitarget missionsActa Astronautica, Vol. 166A data-driven indirect method for nonlinear optimal control28 August 2019 | Astrodynamics, Vol. 3, No. 4Real-Time Optimal Control for Spacecraft Orbit Transfer via Multiscale Deep Neural NetworksIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 55, No. 5Solar sail trajectory optimization of multi-asteroid rendezvous missionActa Astronautica, Vol. 157Fast Homotopy Method for Asteroid Landing Trajectory Optimization Using Approximate Initial CostatesHongwei Yang, Shuang Li and Xiaoli Bai26 November 2018 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 3Low-Thrust Minimum-Fuel Trajectory Optimization Using Multiple Shooting Augmented by Analytical DerivativesYazhe Meng, Hao Zhang and Yang Gao20 December 2018 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 3Neural Networks in Time-Optimal Low-Thrust Interplanetary TransfersIEEE Access, Vol. 7Initial Three-Dimensional Trajectory Design for Solar Sails Using Bezier Shaping ApproachIEEE Access, Vol. 7Learning Trajectories for Real- Time Optimal Control of QuadrotorsPhase-matching homotopic method for indirect optimization of long-duration low-thrust trajectoriesAdvances in Space Research, Vol. 62, No. 3Multi-rendezvous low-thrust trajectory optimization using costate transforming and homotopic approach23 May 2018 | Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 363, No. 6Power-limited low-thrust trajectory optimization with operation point detection18 May 2018 | Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 363, No. 6Performance Comparison of Smoothing Functions for Indirect Optimization of Minimum-Fuel Low-thrust TrajectoriesEhsan Taheri, Ella M. Atkins and Ilya Kolmanovsky7 January 2018On Satellite Orbit Decay Compensation in Low Earth OrbitsEhsan Taheri, Robert A. Zidek, Ilya Kolmanovsky and Anouck Girard7 January 2018Homotopy method for optimization of variable-specific-impulse low-thrust trajectories30 October 2017 | Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 362, No. 11 What's Popular Volume 40, Number 12December 2017 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2017 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0731-5090 (print) or 1533-3884 (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAerodynamicsAeronautical EngineeringAeronauticsAerospace SciencesAstrodynamicsAstronauticsBoundary Element MethodComputational Fluid DynamicsFinite Difference MethodFluid DynamicsNumerical AnalysisOrbital ManeuversPseudospectral MethodsRunge-Kutta MethodsSpace Orbit KeywordsThrustTrajectory OptimizationNumerical OptimizationEarthIon ThrusterCylindrical Coordinate SystemOrbital TransferNumerical IntegrationParticle Swarm OptimizationLegendre Pseudospectral MethodAcknowledgmentThis work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 11672146 and 11432001).PDF Received31 January 2017Accepted6 June 2017Published online2 August 2017

Abstract:No AccessEngineering NoteNonsingular Sliding-Mode Control for Field-of-View Constrained Impact Time GuidanceXiaotian Chen and Jinzhi WangXiaotian ChenState Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, Peking University, 100871 Beijing, People’s Republic of China*Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Mechanics and Engineering Science, College of Engineering; .Search for more papers by this author and Jinzhi WangState Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, Peking University, 100871 Beijing, People’s Republic of China†Professor, Department of Mechanics and Engineering Science, College of Engineering; (Corresponding Author).Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:2 Jan 2018https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003146SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Jeon I.-S., Lee J.-I. and Tahk M.-J., “Impact-Time-Control Guidance Law for Anti-Ship Missiles,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2006, pp. 260–266. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2005.863655 IETTE2 1063-6536 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[2] Jeon I.-S., Lee J.-I. and Tahk M.-J., “Impact-Time-Control Guidance with Generalized Proportional Navigation Based on Nonlinear Formulation,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 8, 2016, pp. 1887–1892. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001681 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[3] Jeon I.-S., Lee J.-I. and Tahk M.-J., “Homing Guidance Law for Cooperative Attack of Multiple Missiles,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2010, pp. 275–280. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.40136 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[4] Kim T.-H., Lee C.-H., Jeon I.-S. and Tahk M.-J., “Augmented Polynomial Guidance with Impact Time and Angle Constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2013, pp. 2806–2817. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2013.6621856 IEARAX 0018-9251 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[5] Kim M., Jung B., Han B., Lee S. and Kim Y., “Lyapunov-Based Impact Time Control Guidance Laws Against Stationary Targets,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 51, No. 2, 2015, pp. 1111–1122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2014.130717 IEARAX 0018-9251 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[6] Kumar S. R. and Ghose D., “Sliding Mode Control Based Guidance Law with Impact Time Constraints,” American Control Conference (ACC), 2013, IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, 2013, pp. 5760–5765. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2013.6580740 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[7] Kumar S. R. and Ghose D., “Impact Time Guidance for Large Heading Errors Using Sliding Mode Control,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 51, No. 4, 2015, pp. 3123–3138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2015.140137 IEARAX 0018-9251 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[8] Cho D., Kim H. J. and Tahk M.-J., “Nonsingular Sliding Mode Guidance for Impact Time Control,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2015, pp. 61–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001167 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[9] Cho N. and Kim Y., “Modified Pure Proportional Navigation Guidance Law for Impact Time Control,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 4, 2016, pp. 852–872. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001618 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[10] Saleem A. and Ratnoo A., “Lyapunov-Based Guidance Law for Impact Time Control and Simultaneous Arrival,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2015, pp. 164–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001349 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[11] Harl N. and Balakrishnan S., “Impact Time and Angle Guidance with Sliding Mode Control,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 20, No. 6, 2012, pp. 1436–1449. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2011.2169795 IETTE2 1063-6536 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[12] Erer K. S. and Tekin R., “Impact Time and Angle Control Based on Constrained Optimal Solutions,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 10, 2016, pp. 2448–2454. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000414 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[13] Tekin R., Erer K. S. and Holzapfel F., “Control of Impact Time with Increased Robustness via Feedback Linearization,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 7, 2016, pp. 1682–1689. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001719 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[14] Tekin R., Erer K. S. and Holzapfel F., “Polynomial Shaping of the Look Angle for Impact-Time Control,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 40, No. 10, 2017, pp. 2668–2673. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002751 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[15] Zhang Y., Wang X. and Wu H., “Impact Time Control Guidance Law with Field of View Constraint,” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 39, Dec. 2014, pp. 361–369. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2014.10.002 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[16] Kim H.-G. and Kim H. J., “Impact Time Control Guidance Considering Seeker’s Field-of-View Limits,” 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, 2016, pp. 4160–4165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2016.7798900 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[17] Zhang Y., Wang X. and Wu H., “Impact Time Control Guidance with Field-of-View Constraint Accounting for Uncertain System Lag,” Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 230, No. 3, 2016, pp. 515–529. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410015594401 Google Scholar[18] Jeon I. S. and Lee J. I., “Impact-Time-Control Guidance Law with Constraints on Seeker Look Angle,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 53, No. 5, Oct 2017, pp. 2621–2627. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2017.2698837 IEARAX 0018-9251 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[19] Feng Y., Yu X. and Han F., “On Nonsingular Terminal Sliding-Mode Control of Nonlinear Systems,” Automatica, Vol. 49, No. 6, 2013, pp. 1715–1722. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2013.01.051 ATCAA9 0005-1098 CrossrefGoogle Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byVarying-Gain Proportional Navigation Guidance for Precise Impact Time ControlWei Dong , Chunyan Wang, Jianan Wang and Ming Xin 13 November 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 46, No. 3Impact time control guidance against maneuvering targets based on a nonlinear virtual relative modelChinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 14Lyapunov-Based Impact Time Control Guidance Law with Performance Prediction20 March 2023 | Aerospace, Vol. 10, No. 3Consensus-Based Finite-Time Cooperative Guidance with Field-of-View Constraint22 June 2022 | International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Vol. 23, No. 5Nonlinear Optimal Guidance for Intercepting Stationary Targets with Impact-Time ConstraintsKun Wang , Zheng Chen , Han Wang, Jun Li and Xueming Shao30 May 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 9Deep reinforcement learning-based impact time control guidance law with constraints on the field-of-viewAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 128Terminal sliding mode guidance design under impact angle and time constraints in three-dimensional spaceCooperative Circular Guidance with Nonuniform Field-of-View ConstraintsYadong Chen, Daqing Guo, Jianan Wang , Jiayuan Shan and Ming Xin 31 March 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 8Unified Method for Field-of-View-Limited Homing GuidanceWei Dong , Chunyan Wang, Jianan Wang , Hungsun Son and Ming Xin 17 April 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 8Three-dimensional field of view and impact angle constrained guidance with terminal speed maximizationAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 126Three-Dimensional Nonsingular Impact Time Guidance With Limited Field-of-ViewIEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 30, No. 4Fixed-Time Circular Impact-Time Guidance with Look Angle Constraint5 July 2022 | Aerospace, Vol. 9, No. 7Sliding mode–based simultaneous control of impact angle and impact time5 July 2021 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 236, No. 7Fixed-Time Terminal Angle-Constrained Cooperative Guidance Law Against Maneuvering TargetIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 58, No. 2Composite Guidance for Impact Time Control Under Physical ConstraintsIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 58, No. 2Cooperative guidance laws against highly maneuvering target with impact time and angle15 June 2021 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 236, No. 5A hybrid proportional navigation based two-stage impact time control guidance lawJournal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, Vol. 33, No. 2Three-Dimensional Impact Time Control Guidance Considering Field-of-View Constraint and Velocity Variation9 April 2022 | Aerospace, Vol. 9, No. 4Adjustable impact-time-control guidance law against non-maneuvering target under limited field of view17 May 2021 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 236, No. 2Distributed Cooperative Guidance of Multi-missile with Unreliable Communications18 March 2022Three Dimensional Nonlinear Guidance Law for Exact Impact Time ControlIEEE Access, Vol. 10Three-Dimensional Prescribed-Time Pinning Group Cooperative Guidance LawInternational Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 2021Time-Constrained Individual Homing Guidance against Stationary TargetsThree-Dimensional Nonsingular Cooperative Guidance Law with Different Field-of-View ConstraintsWei Dong , Chunyan Wang, Jianan Wang and Ming Xin 6 September 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 11Studies on Multi-Constraints Cooperative Guidance Method Based on Distributed MPC for Multi-Missiles17 November 2021 | Applied Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 22Look-Angle-Constrained Control of Arrival Time with Exact Knowledge of Time-to-GoNamhoon Cho and Seokwon Lee 26 May 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 10Field-of-View Constrained Impact Time Guidance Against Stationary TargetsIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 57, No. 5Field-of-View Constrained Impact Time Control Guidance via Time-Varying Sliding Mode Control6 September 2021 | Aerospace, Vol. 8, No. 9Optimal three-dimensional impact time guidance with seeker’s field-of-view constraintChinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 34, No. 2Terminal Time-Constrained Nonlinear Interception Strategies Against Maneuvering TargetsShashi Ranjan Kumar and Dwaipayan Mukherjee2 September 2020 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 1Two-phase guidance law for impact time control under physical constraintsChinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 33, No. 11Consensus Based Cooperative Guidance with a LeaderImpact-Time-Control Guidance Strategy with a Composite Structure Considering the Seeker’s Field-of-View ConstraintSeokwon Lee, Namhoon Cho and Youdan Kim27 April 2020 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 43, No. 8Deviated Pursuit based Cooperative Simultaneous Interception against Moving TargetsFinite-Time Impact Time Guidance using Deviated Pursuit against Maneuvering TargetsNonlinear Impact Time Guidance with Constrained Field-of-ViewA Guidance Strategy for Strapdown Seeker considering Minimum Field-of-View Angle ConstraintInternational Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 2020Optimal Error Dynamics in Missile Guidance14 May 2020Nonsingular PNG-Based Impact Time Control Guidance with Lower Dependence on Time-to-Go EstimateInternational Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 2019Deviated Pursuit Based Interception at A Priori Fixed TimeShashi Ranjan Kumar and Dwaipayan Mukherjee21 April 2019 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 9Circular Impact-Time GuidanceRonny Tsalik and Tal Shima29 May 2019 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 8Fixed Final Time Field of View and Impact Angle Constrained GuidanceAnalytical Impact Time Guidance Law with Reduced Filed-of-View LimitImpact Time Control Guidance with Finite-Time Convergence Based on Pure Proportional NavigationCapturability of Guidance Laws for Interception of Nonmaneuvering Target with Field-of-View LimitSeokwon Lee, Sungjun Ann, Namhoon Cho and Youdan Kim20 December 2018 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 4Three-Dimensional Optimal Impact Time Guidance for Antiship MissilesShaoming He and Defu Lin26 November 2018 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 4Impact Time Control Guidance Law for Guided Projectile Considering Time-Varying VelocitySliding-Mode Impact Time Guidance Law Design for Various Target MotionsQinglei Hu, Tuo Han and Ming Xin17 July 2018 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 1Adaptive Polynomial Guidance With Impact Angle Constraint Under Varying VelocityIEEE Access, Vol. 7 What's Popular Volume 41, Number 5May 2018 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2017 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0731-5090 (print) or 1533-3884 (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAvionicsControl TheoryFeedback ControlGuidance, Navigation, and Control SystemsMilitary ScienceMilitary TechnologyMissile Guidance and ControlMissile Remote Control GuidanceMissile Systems, Dynamics and TechnologyNavigational GuidanceOptimal Control TheoryWeapon Systems KeywordsTerminal Sliding ModeControl GuidanceAutopilotUnmanned Aerial VehicleFlight Path AngleAngle of AttackProportional NavigationClose In Weapon SystemsFeedback LinearizationNumerical AlgorithmsAcknowledgmentThis work is supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China under grants 61473003 and 61633001.PDF Received28 June 2017Accepted4 December 2017Published online2 January 2018

Near-Optimal Midcourse Guidance for Velocity Maximization with Constrained Arrival Angle

Analytical Costate Estimation by a Reference Trajectory-Based Least-Squares Method

Coverage-Based Cooperative Guidance Strategy by Controlling Flight Path Angle

Minimum-Time Rendezvous via Simplified Initial Costate Normalization and Auxiliary Orbital Transfer

Improving Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization by Adjoint Estimation with Shape-Based Path

Warm Start for Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization via Switched System

Impact Time and Angle Control Optimal Guidance with Field-of-View Constraint

Two-Stage Cooperative Guidance Strategy with Impact-Angle and Field-of-View Constraints

Adaptive Dynamic Surface Guidance Law with Input Saturation Constraint and Autopilot Dynamics

Large Field-of-View Infrared Horizon Sensor Attitude Correction for Earth's Oblateness

Active Defense Guidance Law Via Cooperative Identification and Estimation

Constrained Control Allocation of a Quadrotor-Like Autonomous Underwater Vehicle

Closed-Loop, Exact-Time, Minimum-Energy Attitude Control with Analytic Gain Selection

Hybrid Zero-Effort-Miss/Zero-Effort-Velocity Guidance for Powered Descent Phase

Sliding-Mode Guidance for Simultaneous Control of Impact Time and Angle

Nonsingular Sliding-Mode Control for Field-of-View Constrained Impact Time Guidance

Two-Stage Trajectory Planning for Autonomous Deployment and Target Capture of Space Manipulators

Minimum-Time Low-Thrust Geocentric Transfer with Longitude Estimation and Costate Prediction

Active-set pseudospectral model predictive static programming for midcourse guidance

Shaping Approximation for Low-Thrust Trajectories with Large Out-Of-Plane Motion

Simple Shaping Approximation for Low-Thrust Trajectories Between Coplanar Elliptical Orbits