Abstract:No AccessEngineering NoteImproving Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization by Adjoint Estimation with Shape-Based PathFanghua Jiang, Gao Tang and Junfeng LiFanghua JiangTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People’s Republic of China*Associate Professor, School of Aerospace Engineering; . Senior Member AIAA (Corresponding Author).Search for more papers by this author, Gao TangTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People’s Republic of China†Master’s Student, School of Aerospace Engineering; currently Ph.D. Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, Duke University; .Search for more papers by this author and Junfeng LiTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People’s Republic of China‡Professor, School of Aerospace Engineering; .Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:2 Aug 2017https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002803SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Hellín X. L., “Study of Earth-to-Mars Transfers with Low-Thrust Propulsion,” Polytechnic Univ. of Catalonia, School of Industrial and Aeronautical Engineering, Project Rept., Terrassa, Spain, Sept. 2011. Google Scholar[2] Betts J. T., “Survey of Numerical Methods for Trajectory Optimization,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1998, pp. 193–207. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4231 LinkGoogle Scholar[3] Casalino L., “Approximate Optimization of Low-Thrust Transfers Between Low-Eccentricity Close Orbits,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2014, pp. 1003–1008. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.62046 LinkGoogle Scholar[4] Gatto G. and Casalino L., “Fast Evaluation and Optimization of Low-Thrust Transfers to Multiple Targets,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 38, No. 8, 2015, pp. 1525–1530. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001116 LinkGoogle Scholar[5] Zhao S. G., Gurfil P. and Zhang J. R., “Initial Costates for Low-Thrust Minimum-Time Station Change of Geostationary Satellites,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 12, 2016, pp. 2746–2756. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000431 LinkGoogle Scholar[6] Dixon L. C. W. and Biggs M. C., “The Advantages of Adjoint-Control Transformations When Determining Optimal Trajectories by Pontryagin’s Maximum Principle,” Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 76, No. 735, 1972, pp. 169–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000042731 Google Scholar[7] Russell R. P., “Primer Vector Theory Applied to Global Low-Thrust Trade Studies,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2007, pp. 460–472. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.22984 LinkGoogle Scholar[8] Guo T. D., Jiang F. H. and Li J. F., “Homotopic Approach and Pseudospectral Method Applied Jointly to Low Thrust Trajectory Optimization,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 71, Feb.–March 2012, pp. 38–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.08.008 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[9] Petropoulos A. E. and Longuski J. M., “Shape-Based Algorithm for the Automated Design of Low-Thrust, Gravity-Assist Trajectories,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2004, pp. 787–796. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.13095 LinkGoogle Scholar[10] Wall B. J. and Conway B. A., “Shape-Based Approach to Low-Thrust Rendezvous Trajectory Design,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2009, pp. 95–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.36848 LinkGoogle Scholar[11] Gondelach D. J. and Noomen R., “Hodographic-Shaping Method for Low-Thrust Interplanetary Trajectory Design,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2015, pp. 728–738. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A32991 LinkGoogle Scholar[12] Taheri E. and Abdelkhalik O., “Initial Three-Dimensional Low-Thrust Trajectory Design,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 57, No. 3, 2016, pp. 889–903. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.11.034 Google Scholar[13] Taheri E., Li N. I. and Kolmanovsky I., “Co-State Initialization for the Minimum-Time Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 59, No. 9, 2017, pp. 2360–2373. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.02.010 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[14] Taheri E., Li N. I. and Kolmanovsky I., “Co-States Initialization of Minimum-Time Low-Thrust Trajectories Using Shape-Based Methods,” American Control Conference (ACC), IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, July 2016, pp. 4053–4058. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2016.7525558 Google Scholar[15] Jiang F. H., Baoyin H. X. and Li J. F., “Practical Techniques for Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization with Homotopic Approach,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2012, pp. 245–258. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.52476 LinkGoogle Scholar[16] Tang G. and Jiang F. H., “Capture of Near-Earth Objects with Low-Thrust Propulsion and Invariant Manifolds,” Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 361, No. 1, 2016, Paper 10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-015-2592-0 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[17] Lewallen J. M., Schwausch O. A. and Tapley B. D., “Coordinate System Influence on the Regularized Trajectory Optimization Problem,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1971, pp. 15–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/3.30211 LinkGoogle Scholar[18] Ranieri C. L. and Ocampo C. A., “Indirect Optimization of Spiral Trajectories,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2006, pp. 1360–1366. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.19539 LinkGoogle Scholar[19] Jiang F. H. and Tang G., “Systematic Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization for a Multi-Rendezvous Mission Using Adjoint Scaling,” Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 361, No. 4, 2016, Paper 117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-016-2704-5 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[20] Bertrand R. and Epenoy R., “New Smoothing Techniques for Solving Bang–Bang Optimal Control Problems Numerical Results and Statistical Interpretation,” Optimal Control Applications and Methods, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2002, pp. 171–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/oca.709 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[21] More J. J., Garbow B. S. and Hillstrom K. E., “User Guide for MinPack-1,” Argonne National Lab. Rept. ANL-80-74, Lemont, IL, 1980; also https://github.com/devernay/cminpack [retrieved 10 Dec. 2012]. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[22] Novak D. M. and Vasile M., “Improved Shaping Approach to the Preliminary Design of Low-Thrust Trajectories,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2011, pp. 128–147. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.50434 LinkGoogle Scholar[23] Xie C., Zhang G. and Zhang Y., “Shaping Approximation for Low-Thrust Trajectories with Large Out-of-Plane Motion,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 12, 2016, pp. 2780–2789. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001795 LinkGoogle Scholar[24] Popescu M., “Applications of Canonical Transformations in Optimizing Orbital Transfers,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1997, pp. 774–779. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4112 LinkGoogle Scholar[25] Wall B. J. and Novak D. M., “A 3D Shape-Based Approximation Method for Low-Thrust Trajectory Design,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 142, Jan. 2012, pp. 1163–1176; also American Astronomical Soc. Paper 11-479, 2011. Google Scholar[26] Kluever C. A., “Efficient Computation of Optimal Interplanetary Trajectories Using Solar Electric Propulsion,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 38, No. 5, 2014, pp. 821–830. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000144 LinkGoogle Scholar[27] Taheri E., Kolmanovsky I. and Atkins E., “Enhanced Smoothing Technique for Indirect Optimization of Minimum-Fuel Low-Thrust Trajectories,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 11, 2016, pp. 2500–2511. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000379 LinkGoogle Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byExploiting Scaling Constants to Facilitate the Convergence of Indirect Trajectory Optimization Methods12 February 2023 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 8GTOC 11: Results from Tsinghua University and Shanghai Institute of Satellite EngineeringActa Astronautica, Vol. 202Atlas of Optimal Low-Thrust Rephasing Solutions in Circular OrbitDi Wu, Xiang Guo , Fanghua Jiang and Hexi Baoyin23 December 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 0, No. 0Rapid optimization of continuous trajectory for multi-target exploration propelled by electric sailsAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 129Analytical Costate Estimation by a Reference Trajectory-Based Least-Squares MethodDi Wu, Lin Cheng , Fanghua Jiang and Junfeng Li31 March 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 8Fast costate estimation for indirect trajectory optimization using Bezier-curve-based shaping approachAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 126Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Optimal Planar Orbit TransfersEnrico Schiassi, Andrea D’Ambrosio , Kristofer Drozd , Fabio Curti and Roberto Furfaro 4 January 2022 | Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 59, No. 3Efficient optimization method for variable-specific-impulse low-thrust trajectories with shutdown constraint7 February 2022 | Science China Technological Sciences, Vol. 65, No. 3Analytical shaping method for low-thrust rendezvous trajectory using cubic spline functionsActa Astronautica, Vol. 72High-precision shape approximation low-thrust trajectory optimization method satisfying bi-objective indexChinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 35, No. 1Analytic Costate Initialization from Rough State-Trajectory EstimatesEmmanuel E. Skamangas, John A. Lawton and Jonathan T. Black6 September 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 12Minimum-time low-thrust many-revolution geocentric trajectories with analytical costates initializationAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 119A New 3D Shaping Method for Low-Thrust Trajectories between Non-Intersect Orbits24 October 2021 | Aerospace, Vol. 8, No. 11Fuel-Optimal Spacecraft Cluster Flight Around an Ellipsoidal AsteroidWei Wang, Di Wu, Hanlun Lei and Hexi Baoyin7 July 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 10Rapid generation of low-thrust many-revolution earth-center trajectories based on analytical state-based controlActa Astronautica, Vol. 187Warm Start for Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization via Switched SystemDi Wu, Fanghua Jiang and Junfeng Li21 June 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 9A homotopy approach connecting time-optimal with fuel-optimal trajectories19 January 2021 | Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 366, No. 1Warm-Start Multihomotopic Optimization for Low-Thrust Many-Revolution TrajectoriesIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 56, No. 6Efficient Computation of Optimal Low Thrust Gravity Perturbed Orbit Transfers14 May 2019 | The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 67, No. 2Optimization of Variable-Specific-Impulse Gravity-Assist TrajectoriesZhemin Chi, Di Wu, Fanghua Jiang and Junfeng Li14 November 2019 | Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 57, No. 2Multi-revolution low-thrust trajectory optimization using symplectic methods31 December 2019 | Science China Technological Sciences, Vol. 63, No. 3Deep networks as approximators of optimal low-thrust and multi-impulse cost in multitarget missionsActa Astronautica, Vol. 166A data-driven indirect method for nonlinear optimal control28 August 2019 | Astrodynamics, Vol. 3, No. 4Real-Time Optimal Control for Spacecraft Orbit Transfer via Multiscale Deep Neural NetworksIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 55, No. 5Solar sail trajectory optimization of multi-asteroid rendezvous missionActa Astronautica, Vol. 157Fast Homotopy Method for Asteroid Landing Trajectory Optimization Using Approximate Initial CostatesHongwei Yang, Shuang Li and Xiaoli Bai26 November 2018 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 3Low-Thrust Minimum-Fuel Trajectory Optimization Using Multiple Shooting Augmented by Analytical DerivativesYazhe Meng, Hao Zhang and Yang Gao20 December 2018 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 3Neural Networks in Time-Optimal Low-Thrust Interplanetary TransfersIEEE Access, Vol. 7Initial Three-Dimensional Trajectory Design for Solar Sails Using Bezier Shaping ApproachIEEE Access, Vol. 7Learning Trajectories for Real- Time Optimal Control of QuadrotorsPhase-matching homotopic method for indirect optimization of long-duration low-thrust trajectoriesAdvances in Space Research, Vol. 62, No. 3Multi-rendezvous low-thrust trajectory optimization using costate transforming and homotopic approach23 May 2018 | Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 363, No. 6Power-limited low-thrust trajectory optimization with operation point detection18 May 2018 | Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 363, No. 6Performance Comparison of Smoothing Functions for Indirect Optimization of Minimum-Fuel Low-thrust TrajectoriesEhsan Taheri, Ella M. Atkins and Ilya Kolmanovsky7 January 2018On Satellite Orbit Decay Compensation in Low Earth OrbitsEhsan Taheri, Robert A. Zidek, Ilya Kolmanovsky and Anouck Girard7 January 2018Homotopy method for optimization of variable-specific-impulse low-thrust trajectories30 October 2017 | Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 362, No. 11 What's Popular Volume 40, Number 12December 2017 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2017 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0731-5090 (print) or 1533-3884 (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAerodynamicsAeronautical EngineeringAeronauticsAerospace SciencesAstrodynamicsAstronauticsBoundary Element MethodComputational Fluid DynamicsFinite Difference MethodFluid DynamicsNumerical AnalysisOrbital ManeuversPseudospectral MethodsRunge-Kutta MethodsSpace Orbit KeywordsThrustTrajectory OptimizationNumerical OptimizationEarthIon ThrusterCylindrical Coordinate SystemOrbital TransferNumerical IntegrationParticle Swarm OptimizationLegendre Pseudospectral MethodAcknowledgmentThis work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 11672146 and 11432001).PDF Received31 January 2017Accepted6 June 2017Published online2 August 2017

Abstract:No AccessEngineering NotesRobust Saturated Finite-Time Attitude Control for Spacecraft Using Integral Sliding ModeYong Guo, Bing Huang, Shen-min Song, Ai-jun Li and Chang-qing WangYong GuoNorthwestern Polytechnical University, 710129 Xi’an, People’s Republic of China*Assistant Professor, School of Automation, 127 Youyi West Road, Beilin, Shaanxi; .Search for more papers by this author, Bing HuangNorthwestern Polytechnical University, 710129 Xi’an, People’s Republic of China†Ph.D. Student, School of Automation, 127 Youyi West Road, Beilin, Shaanxi.Search for more papers by this author, Shen-min SongHarbin Institute of Technology, 150001 Harbin, People’s Republic of China‡Professor, Center for Control Theory and Guidance Technology.Search for more papers by this author, Ai-jun LiNorthwestern Polytechnical University, 710129 Xi’an, People’s Republic of China§Professor, School of Automation, 127 Youyi West Road, Beilin, Shaanxi.Search for more papers by this author and Chang-qing WangNorthwestern Polytechnical University, 710129 Xi’an, People’s Republic of China¶Associate Professor, School of Automation, 127 Youyi West Road, Beilin, Shaanxi.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:26 Nov 2018https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003520SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Zou A. M., Kumar K. D. and de Ruiter A. H., “Spacecraft Attitude Control Using Two Control Torques,” Information Sciences, Vol. 408, Oct. 2017, pp. 23–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.04.032 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[2] Show L. L., Juang J. C., Lin C. T. and Jan Y. W., “Spacecraft Robust Attitude Tracking Design: PID Control Approach,” American Control Conference (ACC), IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, 2002, pp. 1360–1365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2002.1023210 Google Scholar[3] Li Y., Sun Z. and Ye D., “Robust Linear PID Controller for Satellite Attitude Stabilization and Attitude Tracking Control,” International Journal of Space Science and Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2016, pp. 64–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSPACESE.2016.078581 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[4] Wang Q., Zhou B., Wen C. and Duan G. R., “Output Feedback Gain Scheduled Control of Actuator Saturated Linear Systems with Applications to the Spacecraft Rendezvous,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, Vol. 351, No. 11, 2014, pp. 5015–5033. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2014.08.009 JFINAB 0016-0032 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[5] Chen B. S., Wu C. S. and Jan Y. W., “Adaptive Fuzzy Mixed H2/H∞ Attitude Control of Spacecraft,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2000, pp. 1343–1359. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/7.892682 IEARAX 0018-9251 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[6] Gao X., Teo K. L. and Duan G. R., “Robust H∞ Control of Spacecraft Rendezvous on Elliptical Orbit,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, Vol. 349, No. 8, 2012, pp. 2515–2529. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2012.08.005 JFINAB 0016-0032 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[7] Guo Y., Song S. M., Li X. H. and Li P., “Terminal Sliding Mode Control for Attitude Tracking of Spacecraft Under Input Saturation,” Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2017, Paper 06016006. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000691 JAEEEZ 0893-1321 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[8] Robinett R. D. and Parker G. G., “Spacecraft Euler Parameter Tracking of Large-Angle Maneuvers via Sliding Mode Control,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 19, No. 3, 1996, pp. 702–703. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21677 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[9] Pukdeboon C., “Inverse Optimal Sliding Mode Control of Spacecraft with Coupled Translation and Attitude Dynamics,” International Journal of Systems Science, Vol. 46, No. 13, 2015, pp. 2421–2438. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2015.1011251 IJSYA9 0020-7721 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[10] Hu Q. L., Zhang Y., Huo X. and Xiao B., “Adaptive Integral-Type Sliding Mode Control for Spacecraft Attitude Maneuvering Under Actuator Stuck Failures,” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2011, pp. 32–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1000-9361(11)60005-8 CJAEEZ 1000-9361 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[11] Lu K. and Xia Y., “Finite-Time Fault-Tolerant Control for Rigid Spacecraft with Actuator Saturations,” IET Control Theory and Applications, Vol. 7, No. 11, 2013, pp. 1529–1539. doi:https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cta.2012.1031 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[12] Huang X., Yan Y. and Zhou Y., “Neural Network-Based Adaptive Second Order Sliding Mode Control of Lorentz-Augmented Spacecraft Formation,” Neurocomputing, Vol. 222, Jan. 2017, pp. 191–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2016.10.021 NRCGEO 0925-2312 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[13] Zou A. M. and Kumar K. D., “Distributed Attitude Coordination Control for Spacecraft Formation Flying,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2012, pp. 1329–1346. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2012.6178065 IEARAX 0018-9251 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[14] Guo Y., Song S. M. and Li X. H., “Finite-Time Output Feedback Attitude Coordination Control for Formation Flying Spacecraft Without Unwinding,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 122, May–June 2016, pp. 159–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.01.015 AASTCF 0094-5765 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[15] Guo Y., Guo J. H. and Song S. M., “Backstepping Control for Attitude Tracking of the Spacecraft Under Input Saturation,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 138, Sept. 2017, pp. 318–325. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.06.002 AASTCF 0094-5765 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[16] Shi X. N., Zhou Z. G. and Zhou D., “Finite-Time Attitude Trajectory Tracking Control of Rigid Spacecraft,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 53, No. 6, 2017, pp. 2913–2923. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2017.2720298 IEARAX 0018-9251 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[17] Du H. and Li S., “Semi-Global Finite-Time Attitude Stabilization by Output Feedback for a Rigid Spacecraft,” Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 227, No. 12, 2013, pp. 1881–1891. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410012464454 Google Scholar[18] Lu K. and Xia Y., “Adaptive Attitude Tracking Control for Rigid Spacecraft with Finite-Time Convergence,” Automatica, Vol. 49, No. 12, 2013, pp. 3591–3599. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2013.09.001 ATCAA9 0005-1098 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[19] Huo B., Xia Y., Lu K. and Fu M., “Adaptive Fuzzy Finite-Time Fault-Tolerant Attitude Control of Rigid Spacecraft,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, Vol. 352, No. 10, 2015, pp. 4225–4246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2015.05.042 JFINAB 0016-0032 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[20] Gui H. and Vukovich G., “Global Finite-Time Attitude Tracking via Quaternion Feedback,” Systems and Control Letters, Vol. 97, Nov. 2016, pp. 176–183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2016.09.017 SCLEDC 0167-6911 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[21] Cheng Y., Du H., He Y. and Jia R., “Distributed Finite-Time Attitude Regulation for Multiple Rigid Spacecraft Via Bounded Control,” Information Sciences, Vol. 328, Jan. 2016, pp. 144–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2015.08.042 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[22] Hu Q., Jiang B. and Friswell M. I., “Robust Saturated Finite Time Output Feedback Attitude Stabilization for Rigid Spacecraft,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 37, No. 6, 2014, pp. 1914–1929. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000153 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[23] Su Y., “Comment on “Robust Saturated Finite Time Output Feedback Attitude Stabilization for Rigid Spacecraft,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 40, No. 6, 2016, pp. 1538–1539. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001555 JGCODS 0731-5090 Google Scholar[24] Huo M., Huo X., Karimi H. R. and Ni J., “Finite-Time Control for Attitude Tracking Maneuver of Rigid Satellite,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, Vol. 2014, Feb. 2014, Paper 302982. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/302982 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[25] Xiao B., Hu Q., Zhang Y. and Huo X., “Fault-Tolerant Tracking Control of Spacecraft with Attitude-Only Measurement Under Actuator Failures,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2014, pp. 838–849. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.61369 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[26] Khalil H. K., Nonlinear Systems, 3rd ed., Prentice–Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002, p. 128. Google Scholar[27] Krstic M., Kanellakopoulos I. and Kokotovic P., Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design, Vol. 222, Wiley, New York, 1995, pp. 490–491. Google Scholar[28] Du H. and Li S., “Finite-Time Attitude Stabilization for a Spacecraft Using Homogeneous Method,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2012, pp. 740–748. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.56262 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[29] Feng Y., Yu X. and Man Z., “Non-Singular Terminal Sliding Mode Control of Rigid Manipulators,” Automatica, Vol. 38, No. 12, 2002, pp. 2159–2167. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-1098(02)00147-4 ATCAA9 0005-1098 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[30] Qian C. and Lin W., “A Continuous Feedback Approach to Global Strong Stabilization of Nonlinear Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 46, No. 7, 2001, pp. 1061–1079. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/9.935058 IETAA9 0018-9286 CrossrefGoogle Scholar Previous article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byPrescribed-Time Spacecraft Attitude Control Using Time-Varying State FeedbackVikram Kumar Saini, Dipak Kumar Giri and Renuganth Varatharajoo10 March 2023 | Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 0, No. 0Predefined‐time control for Euler–Lagrange systems with model uncertainties and actuator faults26 September 2022 | Asian Journal of Control, Vol. 25, No. 2Prescribed Time Spacecraft Attitude Control Using Time-Varying State-FeedbackVikram K. Saini and Dipak K. Giri19 January 2023Three-dimensional impact angles constrained integral sliding mode guidance law for missiles with input saturation23 February 2022 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 236, No. 14Global finite‐time cooperative control for multiple manipulators using integral sliding mode control9 March 2022 | Asian Journal of Control, Vol. 24, No. 6Disturbance observer-based nonfragile fuzzy tracking control of a spacecraftAdvances in Space Research, Vol. 33Adaptive chaos synchronization of an attitude control of satellite: A backstepping based sliding mode approachHeliyon, Vol. 8, No. 11Finite-time stabilization for a novel non-contact spacecraft with a small air-clearance range constraintMechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 180Attitude tracking control for fractionated spacecraft with actuator failures under adaptive event-triggered strategyAdvances in Space Research, Vol. 70, No. 5Fault-Tolerant Reduced-Attitude Control for Spacecraft Constrained Boresight ReorientationXiaodong Shao, Qinglei Hu, Zheng H. Zhu and Youmin Zhang 2 May 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 8Novel finite-time adaptive sliding mode tracking control for disturbed mechanical systems6 May 2022 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, Vol. 236, No. 16Efficient Event-Based Adaptive Sliding Mode Control for Spacecraft Attitude StabilizationSyed Muhammad Amrr , Arghya Chakravarty, Md. Mottahir Alam, Abdullah A. Algethami and M. Nabi21 March 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 7Indirect Neural-Enhanced Integral Sliding Mode Control for Finite-Time Fault-Tolerant Attitude Tracking of Spacecraft15 July 2022 | Mathematics, Vol. 10, No. 14Adaptive actor-critic learning-based robust appointed-time attitude tracking control for uncertain rigid spacecrafts with performance and input constraintsAdvances in Space Research, Vol. 66Rotation matrix-based finite-time attitude coordinated control for spacecraftAdvances in Space Research, Vol. 69, No. 2Adaptive fuzzy fault-tolerant control for the attitude tracking of spacecraft within finite timeActa Astronautica, Vol. 189Passivity-Based Pulse-Width-Modulated Spacecraft Attitude ControlXiaoyu Lang and Anton de Ruiter30 July 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 11Event-triggered sliding mode attitude coordinated control for spacecraft formation flying system with disturbancesActa Astronautica, Vol. 188A novel finite-time prescribed performance control scheme for spacecraft attitude trackingAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 118Finite-time distributed formation control for multiple unmanned surface vehicles with input saturationOcean Engineering, Vol. 233Stability Analysis of A Class of Second-Order Phase Plane Control Systems: A Simulation StudyReview of advanced guidance and control algorithms for space/aerospace vehiclesProgress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 122Coordinated attitude control for flexible spacecraft formation with actuator configuration misalignmentChinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 34, No. 3Neural Network-Based Finite-Time Fault-Tolerant Control for Spacecraft without UnwindingInternational Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 2021Finite-Time Fault-Tolerant Spacecraft Attitude Control with Torque Saturation14 March 2021OverviewReferencesRobust Nonsingular Terminal Sliding Mode Attitude Control of SatellitesJournal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 34, No. 1Finite-time attitude maneuvering and vibration suppression of flexible spacecraftJournal of the Franklin Institute, Vol. 357, No. 16Rigid spacecraft robust optimal attitude stabilization under actuator misalignmentsAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 105Continuous Finite-Time Integral Sliding Mode Control for Attitude StabilizationIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, Vol. 67, No. 10Neural network-based adaptive terminal sliding mode control for the deployment process of the dual-body tethered satellite system21 December 2019 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 234, No. 6Finite-time blended control for air-to-air missile with lateral thrusters and aerodynamic surfacesAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 97Hyperbolic Tangent Function-Based Finite-Time Sliding Mode Control for Spacecraft Rendezvous Maneuver Without ChatteringIEEE Access, Vol. 8Continuous Fixed-Time Sliding Mode Attitude Controller Design for Rigid-Body SpacecraftIEEE Access, Vol. 8Inertial vector measurements based attitude synchronization control for multiple spacecraft formationAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 93 What's Popular Volume 42, Number 2February 2019 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2018 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0731-5090 (print) or 1533-3884 (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAerospace SciencesAstrodynamicsAstronauticsAttitude ControlSpace Systems and VehiclesSpacecraft DesignSpacecraft SystemSpacecrafts KeywordsSpacecraft ModelsAttitude DynamicsIntegral Sliding Mode ControlOutput FeedbackAttitude TrackingAttitude KinematicsSpacecraft SystemSpacecraft ControlAtmospheric DragFuzzy LogicAcknowledgmentsThis study was cosupported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 61803307) and the Aeronautical Science Foundation of China under grant nos. 20160153003 and 2016ZC53019.PDF Received18 December 2017Accepted5 September 2018Published online26 November 2018

Analytical Costate Estimation by a Reference Trajectory-Based Least-Squares Method

Warm Start for Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization via Switched System

Minimum-Time Rendezvous via Simplified Initial Costate Normalization and Auxiliary Orbital Transfer

Minimum-Time Low-Thrust Geocentric Transfer with Longitude Estimation and Costate Prediction

Improving Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization by Adjoint Estimation with Shape-Based Path

Simple Shaping Approximation for Low-Thrust Trajectories Between Coplanar Elliptical Orbits

Shaping Approximation for Low-Thrust Trajectories with Large Out-Of-Plane Motion

Hybrid Zero-Effort-Miss/Zero-Effort-Velocity Guidance for Powered Descent Phase

Closed-Loop, Exact-Time, Minimum-Energy Attitude Control with Analytic Gain Selection

Constrained Control Allocation of a Quadrotor-Like Autonomous Underwater Vehicle

Two-Stage Trajectory Planning for Autonomous Deployment and Target Capture of Space Manipulators

Fuel-Optimal Trajectory Optimization for Lunar Soft Landing Via Enhanced Simultaneous Dynamic Optimization Approach

Three-Dimensional Trajectory Optimization for Lunar Ascent Using Gauss Pseudospectral Method

Practical Techniques for Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization with Homotopic Approach

Uncertainty Quantification for Short Rendezvous Missions Using a Nonlinear Covariance Propagation Method

Near-Time-Optimal Repointing Maneuver of a Spacecraft with One DOF for Final Attitude

Optimal Design and Tracking Control of Low-Thrust Orbit Transfers Between Planar and Vertical Lyapunov Orbits

Low-thrust Trajectory Optimization of Asteroid Sample Return Mission with Multiple Revolutions and Moon Gravity Assists

Optimal Low-Thrust Orbit Transfers Made Easy: A Direct Approach

Long-Term Analytical Boundedness Conditions for Relative Orbits under Third-Body Perturbations

Robust Saturated Finite-Time Attitude Control for Spacecraft Using Integral Sliding Mode