Numerical study of solidification and melting behavior of the thermal energy storage system with non-uniform metal foam and active rotation
Chao Yang,Xu-Ge Wang,Xing-Rong Xu,Maitiniyazi Bake,Chun-Mei Wu,You-Rong Li,Jia-Jia Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.111353
IF: 9.4
2024-05-01
Journal of Energy Storage
Abstract:This paper focuses on the strengthening study of the latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) unit and proposes a coupling strengthening method with non-uniform graded metal foam and active rotation. The non-uniform graded metal foams are employed to enhance heat conduction, and the rotation method is selected to make full use of natural convection. The solidification and melting behavior under the coupling effect of non-uniform metal foam and active rotation are numerically analyzed. The aluminum foam is partially concentrated and divided into two parts (concentrated part and diluted part) and is divided into the even-layered or uneven-layered porous structures according to the different regions area. Under the same volume of phase change material (PCM), the effects of layered forms (even-layered and uneven-layered approach), concentrated porosity, concentrated ratio, and rotational speed are performed. It can be concluded that the metal foam should concentrated near the inner tube and the uneven-layered structure can further improve the phase change heat transfer performance compared to the even-layered structure. Moreover, the thermal performance of the LHTES unit improves firstly and then decreases as the concentrated porosity, concentrated ratio, and rotational speed increase. The optimal values are obtained at 0.86 concentrated porosity, 0.3 concentrated ratio, and 0.5 rpm rotational speed. Compared with the static case with uniform metal foam, the melting time, solidification time, and total melting and solidification time can be significantly reduced by 40.30 %, 28.66 %, and 33.18 %, respectively. Similarly, the thermal energy storage rate can be correspondingly increased by 62.57 %, 40.82 %, and 54.11 %, respectively.
energy & fuels