Ceramic Coating of a Titanium Alloy Implant Prevents Cartilage Damage Due to Localized Cartilage Defects

Pingheng Lan,Xiaokang Li,Xiangli Fan,Zhigang Wu,Lei Shi,Cairu Wang,Yong-Quan Zhang,Haoqiang Zhang,Hao Shen,Peng Gao,Jia-Hua Lin,Yang Yu,Ling Wang,Zheng Guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1166/jbt.2016.1477
2016-01-01
Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering
Abstract:Localized cartilage defects are increasingly treated by metallic resurfacing. However, few preclinical reports exist to identify the optimal materials for metallic resurfacing implants. The study aimed for addressing whether an oxidized zirconium ceramic surface coating on a Ti6Al4V (C-TAV) implant would hold an advantage over the Ti6Al4V (TAV) implant regarding the cartilage resurfacing. Accordingly, standardized defects were generated in the lateral femoral condyles for both knees of nine sheep. The defects were treated with the TAV or C-TAV implants or left untreated. Three un-operated sheep served as controls. The animals were sacrificed at 12 months. The mechanical tests of implants were measured before the implantation and 12 months later. The damage to opposing cartilage was analyzed macroscopically and microscopically. As a result, the friction coefficient of the C-TAV was significantly lower than that of the TAV (P = 0.008; 95% CI: 0.003, 0.01). The C-TAV had lower surface roughness than the TAV (P = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.009, 0.289), at 12 months post-surgery. Macroscopic and microscopic analyses indicated that the C-TAV did not cause obvious damage to the opposing cartilage. Collectively, the study provides novel line of evidence validating the advantages of C-TAV coating without additional adverse damage.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?