Comparison of Two Methods for Glycated Hemoglobin(Hb A1c) Measurement

LI Jun-min,YANG Ying,DONG Xu-wan,LI Shan,WANG Ju-fang,CAO Cheng-xi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13982/j.mfst.1673-9078.2016.1.045
2016-01-01
Abstract:The level of glycated hemoglobin(Hb A1c) in the blood is a standard measure of the long-term glycemic status of the human body. High-performance liquid chromatography(HPLC) is the standard reference method for Hb A1 c measurement as designated by the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine(IFCC). Gel-capillary isoelectric focusing(c IEF) with a stable p H gradient of 20 mmol/L Na OH(catholyte solution) and 20 mmol/L sulfuric acid(anolyte solution) and gels containing ampholytes have outstanding separation power. In this study, HPLC has been compared to gel-c IEF for the measurement of Hb A1 c. HPLC and gel-c IEF were used to measure the Hb A1 c values of 46 randomly selected blood samples. Correlation analysis revealed that the two methods showed a good correlation. The HPLC method was prone to interference by hemoglobin variants and exhibited low specificity. The gel-c IEF method was not affected by hemoglobin variants and showed high specificity. In conclusion, gel-c IEF can be used as an alternative method to HPLC for the standard detection of glycated hemoglobin.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?