Abstract:The initial of debris flow can be classified into two types based on their triggering positions, that is, debris flow from slope and debris flow from gully or channel. For the former, great progress has been achieved on the mechanisms of soil failure and liquefaction. The framework established by a series of theories or laws, such as the Mohr–Coulomb criteria, the unsaturated soil mechanics, and the critical state of soil mass, has been used widely in industry and research. However, the details and discrimination basis for the transformation process from landslide into debris flow still need to be further clarified. Relatively, debris flow from gully or channel is more complex due to its various mass sources and the diversity of processes. Nevertheless, through a great number of case studies and experimental statistics, people have gradually recognized the influential rule and critical condition of factors from landform, hydrology, and other aspects on debris flow initiation. Furthermore, based on the theories of granular flow, continuum mechanics, and rheological law, some typical event-based scenarios can also be reproduced by different single-/two-phase depth integral/average numerical models. However, some key knowledge on mechanism and application level is still insufficient, such as the erosion and entrainment mechanism of materials from different sources, the boundary tractions and materials exchange, as well as the selection of prediction indicators. Three current discriminated methodologies for debris flow initiation, that is, the safety factor method, the rainfall indicator method, and the comprehensive assessment method, were summarized in this article. Considering the technical limitation of each methodology, it is believed that the establishment or improvement of a unified, stable, and open-access database system for event registration and query, as well as the development of large-scale and high-precision rainfall monitoring, is still regarded as the important aspect of debris flow prevention in the future. In addition, as an economic and efficiency means for obtaining information on potential threats and real-time hazard messages, the multielement method for debris flow is recommended as a long-term reference.

Debris Flow and Its Subject Attribute

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MOVEMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF NON-HOMOGENEOUS DEBRIS FLOW AND PEAK FLOW

The Basic Topics of Prediction and Forecast for Geomorphic Hazards——Taking Debris Flow as an Example

Multiscale Anaylsys of Debris Flows

Debris flows: Experiments and modelling

Relationships between starting motion of large-sized particles in debris flow and water flow condition

Experimental Study on Debris Flow Head and the Energy Theory

Study of Pore Fluid Effect on the Mobility of Granular Debris Flows

Experimental Study on the Deposition Process of Debris Flows

Study on the formation and characteristics of height of debris flow head

[Research progress in post-fire debris flow]

Earthquake and Debris Flow Activities

Hazard Assessment of Debris Flow Based on Geomorphic Information Entropy in Catchment

Research Progress of Initial Mechanism on Debris Flow and Related Discrimination Methods: A Review

ANALYSIS ON CRITICAL HYDRAULIC CONDITION FOR STARTING MOTION OF LARGE-SIZED PARTICLES IN VISCOUS DEBRIS FLOW

Debris Flow Disaster and Water and Soil Loss

Exploring debris flow deposit morphology in river valleys: Insights from physical modeling experiments

Mechanism and Prevention of Debris Flow Disaster

Forest Vegetation and Debris Flow Activities

Spatial and temporal evolution of an experimental debris flow, exhibiting coupled fluid and particulate phases

Analysis of Debris-Flow Dynamics Based on Seismic Signals: Insights from Laboratory Experiments and Field Monitoring