A Positive Analysis of the Criterion of State Compensatory Liability
ZHU Xin-li,YU Jun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942x.2005.02.016
2005-01-01
Abstract:From the perspective of tort law, the transgression criterion of liability of China's state compensatory system pertains to ″subjective transgression″. This cognition of taking transgression as administrative agency's violation of various legal norms by which the attention duty is set up may serve to overcome the limitation of transgression criterion as well as to broaden the scope on which the transgression criterion of liability is applied, although the criterion is still faulted with insuperable limitations. In present legal system, the transgression by this criterion is only considered as violating the laws, statutes and regulation enacted by various legislatures, which seriously restricts the applying scope of the criterion and weakens the function of protecting human rights in China's state compensatory system. In view of the current development in the research on criterion of liability of China's state compensatory system, it is necessary to analyze the internal logic of the criterion of liability of state compensatory law from an academic perspective, so as to reiterate a kind of normative criterion of liability of state compensatory system which is linked to the relatively mature criterion of liability of civil tort law. In the analytical framework of the theory of subjective and objective legal order of analytical positive jurisprudence, the fault criterion liability involves the violation of both the subjective legal order and the objective legal order, and the non-fault criterion only relates violation of the objective order. The ultimate approach to improve the criterion of liability of China's state compensatory system rests with that, the present transgression criterion of liability should be replaced by the fault criterion of liability and the non-fault criterion of liability should be established only as a supplementary criterion.