Abstract:Objective:To investigate the effect of transurethral prostatectomy (TURP) on patients with detrusor underactivity (DU).Methods:From January 2015 to January 2019, 72 male patients from Peking University People’s hospital who underwent TURP treatment were retrospectively analyzed. The age of all patients range from 51 to 89, with an average age of 72 years old. All patients underwent urodynamic examination before surgery. The patients were divided into three groups according to BCI and P detQmax. DU group(BCI<100 and P detQmax≤40 cmH 2O) consisted of 31 patients. Then DU patients were divided into two groups according to the P detQmax: Group A, P detQmax≤20 cmH 2O, involving 9 patients; Group B, 20 cmH 2O<P detQmax≤40 cmH 2O, involving 22 patients. Non-DU group(BCI≥100 and 40 cmH 2O<P detQmax≤60 cmH 2O), also named the control GroupC, included 41 patients. There was no statistically significant difference in term of age and duration of disease among the three groups ( P<0.05). Preoperative international prostate symptom scores(IPSS)of the three groups were(26.40±5.54), (21.04±4.61)and(18.53±4.41), respectively. The quality of life score (QOL) were(4.70±1.34), (3.37±1.11)and(3.49±1.34), respectively. The Q max were(4.60±2.63), (8.48±2.47)and(11.38±4.00)ml/s, respectively. The residual urine volume (PVR) were(152.90±75.26), (90.78±51.97)and(53.23±38.98)ml, respectively. The preoperative IPSS and QOL of patients in group A were significantly higher than those in group B and group C, and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05), whereas the difference between group B and group C was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). The preoperative Q max of group A was significantly inferior than that of group B and C, with statistically significant difference ( P<0.05) and group B was significantly inferior than group C, with statistically significant difference ( P<0.05). The preoperative PVR of group A was significantly higher than that of group B and group C, with statistically significant difference ( P<0.05)and group B was significantly higher than group C, with statistically significant difference ( P<0.05). The above indicators were followed up to compare the improvement for the three groups of patients. Seventy-two patients were followed up for free Q max(fQ max) PVR, IPSS and QOL score from March 2019 to June 2019. Results:The 72 patients were followed up for 3 to 52 months, with an average of 31.1 months. Postoperative IPSS of the three groups were(25.50±2.84), (16.78±4.04)and(14.98±3.41), respectively. The QOL were (2.90±1.29), (2.67±0.88)and(2.53±0.92), respectively. The fQ max was (5.44±2.60), (10.30±3.68)and(13.07±3.51) ml/s, respectively, and PVR was(104.00±46.00), (76.81±46.74)and(35.64±26.17)ml, respectively. Compared with the preoperative parameters, QOL in group A was significantly improved, with statistically significant difference ( P<0.05) and the IPSS, fQ max and PVR in group A were improved, but the difference was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). The IPSS, QOL, fQ max and PVR in group B and C were significantly improved compared with the preoperative parameters, and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05). Conclusions:The subjective and objective indicators of DU patients can be improved after TURP, while for those patients whose P detQmax≤20 cmH 2O, only QOL can be improved significantly, and the other indicators can not be improved. Therefore, adequate communication should be made before surgery to inform reasonable expectations for the DU patients.

Significance of Prostate Related Factors by TRUS for Predicting Outcome of TURP

Multivariate study of factors affecting the results of prostate biopsy in PSA grey zone

Diagnostic Significance of Prostate Related Factors by Transrectal Doppler Ultrasonography for BPH

High-risk benign prostatic hyperplasia patients treated with transurethral resection of prostate

The Effect of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate on Erectile Function

[Transurethral Resection of Prostate Perioperative Hypotension]

Post-Voided Residual Ratio Does Not Predict Trifecta Outcome after Transurethral Resection of Prostate

[Changes of Urinary Symptoms after Transurethral Resection of the Prostate and Its Correlation with Clinical Parameters].

Analysis of Improved Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Following Transurethral Resection of Prostate

Evaluation of impact factors on weight and proportion of prostate tissue resected by transurethral resection of prostate

The clinical effect of TURP in patients with detrusor underactivity: a short-term follow-up

The Significance of Transition Zone Volume and Transition Zone Index in the Diagnosis of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

[Analysis of risk factors of urethral stricture and urinary incontinence after transurethral resection of the prostate]

[Predictive Factors for Conversion of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate to Open Prostatectomy].

Correlation between detrusor pressure and transurethral resection of prostate outcome

Clinical Significance of PCAR in Evaluating BOO

Clinical Significance of Preoperative Assessment of Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion in Radical Prostatectomy.

Analysis of Risk Factors for Urinary Continence after Radical Prostatectomy

Impact of Plasmakinetic Resection of Prostate on Sexual Function in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

An evaluation of transurethral plasma kinetic resection versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of symptomatic BPH

Clinical Value of Anatomically Remove Apex of Prostate in TURP