An evaluation of transurethral plasma kinetic resection versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of symptomatic BPH

WANG Zhong-yang,MA Bo,PAN Zhao-jun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-3253.2008.01.009
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical effect in the near future of transurethral plasma kinetic resection versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH).Methods 80 patients who were diagnosised BPH actually were divided into two groups and treated by either TUPKRP or TURP. The perioperative marker and theraputic results were recorded and analyzed.Results There was no significant difference of preoperative factors between the two groups.6 months postoperatively, IPSS,QOL and Q_(max) were significantly improved.Nosignicicant difference in the improvement of subjective sympotoms and objective results has been noted with the different procedures.The incidence of blood transfusion and TRUS occuring,the mean bladder irrigating time,catheration time,hospital stay time were significant shorter in TUPKRP than in TURP.Conclusions Although TUPKRP is as effective as TURP for the treatment of symptomatic BPH.TUPKRP has less adverse side effect and recovering time than TURP.Thus TUPKRP is a better treatment option for BPH.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?