Effect of Total Prostate Volume and Transitional Zone Volume on the Curative Effect of Transurethral Resection of Prostate in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
H M Liu,Y Tian,Z Y Su,Z L Sun,G H Luo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200526-01664
2021-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To compare the clinical effect of different total prostate volume (TPV) and different transitional zone volume (TZV) on benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treated with transurethral resection of prostate(TURP). Methods: Clinical data of 210 patients with BPH admitted to Guizhou provincial people's hospital from June 2016 to August 2018 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. All patients underwent transrectal ultrasonography, and they were divided into three groups according to TPV: 70 patients in group A:TPV<40mL, 98 patients in group B: 40 ml≤TPV<80 ml, and 42 patients in group C:TPV≥80 ml. Meanwhile, three groups were divided according to TZV: 88 patients in group a: TZV<20ml, 67 patients in group b: 20 ml≤TZV<40 ml, and 55 patients in group c:TZV≥40 ml. All of the patients with TURP were followed up for 6 months after surgery, and the data of international prostate symptom score (IPSS), storage symptoms IPSS (IPSS-S), voiding symptoms IPSS (IPSS-V), Quality of Life (QoL) index, and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) were collected before and after surgery. Finally, the effect of TPV and TZV on TURP was analyzed respectively by analysis of variance. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in preoperative IPSS, IPSS-V, IPSS-S, QoL and Qmax among the three groups of patients grouped by TPV (P>0.05), but the age of patients in group C(73.5±6.5) was significantly higher than that in group A (69.3±7.6) and group B (70.9±7.3) (P=0.015). Postoperative IPSS, IPSS-V, IPSS-S, QoL and Qmax of patients in groups A, B and C also showed no significant difference (P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in preoperative IPSS, IPSS-V, IPSS-S, QoL, and Qmax among the three groups of patients grouped according to TZV (P>0.05), while the age of patients in group a (69.2±7.6) was significantly lower than that of patients in group b (72.1±7.2) and group c (72.5±6.7) (P=0.017). There were statistically significant differences in IPSS (P=0.010), IPSS-V (P=0.037), IPSS-S (P=0.022), QoL (P=0.038) and Qmax (P=0.037) among the groups a, b, and c after surgery. Moreover, IPSS, IPSS-V, IPSS-S and QoL were negatively correlated with TZV, while Qmax was positively correlated with TZV. Postoperative IPSS, IPSS-V, IPSS-S, QoL and Qmax were significantly different from those before surgery in groups A, B, C and groups a, b, c (P<0.001). Conclusion: TPV and TZV may not be significantly correlated with BPH symptoms, but may be correlated with age. TURP is an effective treatment for patients with different TPV and TZV. There is no significant statistical difference in the surgical efficacy among patients with different TPV, but patients with larger TZV tended to have better outcome. TZV may be better than TPV in predicting the postoperative efficacy.