Caesarean section or symphysiotomy for obstructed labour for developing countries? Need to ascertain women's preferences

H. Onah,P. Nkwo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443610310001604312

2003-11-01

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research

Abstract:In developed countries there is a tendency towards a small family size especially as there is a good social security system. Good nutrition is assured for the greater majority of children. Pelvic growth is usually optimal resulting in a low prevalence of cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD). Obstetric services are excellent with a low prevalence of obstructed labour; and there is little aversion to caesarean delivery. In fact delay in performing a caesarean section is often the reason for litigation. Both the obstetrician and the parturient usually concur when the need for a caesarean section arises. For the above reasons symphysiotomy is rarely necessary and has been abandoned in those countries. On the other hand most developing countries notably in Africa are characterised by large family sizes (in the absence of a good social security system). In addition they also have a high prevalence of obstructed labour from CPD (usually secondary to poor nutrition during childhood); poor obstetric services; and a cultural dislike for caesarean delivery. Because of the dislike for caesarean delivery and other factors symphysiotomy has been advocated for the management of obstructed labour resulting from CPD in resource-poor settings. (excerpt)