Research Progress in Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Nanostructured Metallic Multilayers
Shen Rucui,An Bang,Wang Yaqiang,Zhang Jinyu,Liu Gang,Sun Jun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13373/j.cnki.cjrm.XY21090009
2023-01-01
Abstract:Nanostructured metallic multilayers are layered structure materials composed of two or more metallic components superimposed alternately with a modulation structure in the nanometer scale, have attracted extensive attention due to their microstructural controllability and excellent mechanical properties. The internal relationship between microstructure and mechanical properties is the basis for the design and preparation of high-performance nanostructured multilayers. Due to the complexity of the structure of metallic multilayers, in-depth study and understanding on the relationship between microstructure and properties of metallic multilayers is of great significance for optimizing their properties, even for developing new metallic multilayers. In this work, the recent research progress in microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of nanostructured metallic multilayers at home and abroad was reviewed, the microstructural features of crystalline/crystalline and crystalline/amorphous metallic multilayers and their influence on mechanical properties, as well as the relationship between the characteristic size and mechanical properties based on the dislocation strengthening theory was summarized. Finally, the existing problems and shortcomings in the current research on nanostructured multilayers and the main directions of future research were discussed. It was concluded that with the reduction in the layer thickness of nanostructured metallic multilayers, the grain morphologies often changed, mainly determined by the lattice mismatch and surface energy between constituents. For the well-studied face-centered cubic（fcc）/fcc and fcc/body-centered cubic（bcc） nanostructured metallic multilayers with relatively low mismatch strains, when the layer thickness decreased, they were more preferred to exhibit the highly textured microstructures, along with the transition from crystalline/crystalline incoherent interfaces at large layer thickness to fully coherent interfaces at extremely small layer thickness. In particular, their interfacial mismatch strain energy could be released via the formation of misfit dislocations, nanotwins, as well as the coherency strain. By contrast, the crystalline/amorphous nanostructured metallic multilayers manifested weak, even no layer thickness-dependent transition of interfacial structures. The nanostructured multilayers composed of different component materials had different grain morphologies and interface structures, which had significant influence on their strength/hardness, tensile ductility and deformation behavior. The mechanical properties of metallic multilayers exhibited notable size and constituent dependence. Based on extensive experiments and simulations, the strengthening mechanism models for different multilayered systems at full length scale had been established, such as Hall-Petch（H-P） relationship at the submicron and microscale with layer thickness range ＞100 nm, confined layer slip（CLS） model at the nanoscale with layer thickness range ＞10 nm and interface barrier strength（IBS） model at the nanoscale with layer thickness range ≤10 nm, to explain the influence of characteristic size and interfacial structure on strength/hardness of multilayers. Previous studies had clearly demonstrated that the plastic deformation behavior of metallic multilayers was closely related to the characteristic size and microstructure. The ductility of crystalline/crystalline multilayers and crystalline/amorphous metallic multilayers varied with the modulation structure. The interaction of the two layers, i.e.the stress field at the crack tip and the deformation capacity of the soft layer, determined the ductility of the multilayers. For the crystalline/crystalline multilayers with equal individual layer thickness, there was the maximum ductility at a critical layer thickness, while for the unequal layered multilayers, their ductility often monotonically decreased with reduction in the layer thickness（or volume fraction） of the soft phase. By contrast, the crystalline/amorphous multilayers exhibited far different mechanical behaviors and properties from their crystalline/crystalline siblings due to the good strain compatibility of this unique interfacial structure and the metastable nature of amorphous layers, which had certain plastic deformation ability when the characteristic size was reduced to the nano-scale and would become crystallized under deformation or heating conditions. Therefore, the mechanical properties of nanostructured multilayers could meet the requirements of specific service conditions by adjusting the crystal structure and characteristic size of component materials to introduce different grain morphologies and interface structures. Because of the complexity of materials and processes, there were also a large number of abnormal interfaces in nanostructured multilayers, such as three-dimensional interfaces, chemical diffusion interfaces and so on, which also notably affected the stress-strain response and the underlying strengthening and deformation mechanisms of nanostructured multilayers. The intrinsic relationship between microstructure and mechanical properties of metallic multilayers under extreme service conditions and the essential reasons for the different crystallization phenomena and mechanical behaviors of crystalline/amorphous nanostructured multilayers could be further researched. Due to preparation and other technological limitations, the deformation mechanisms of nanostructured multilayers at extremely small scale with layer thickness ＜5 nm were not well understood, thus molecular dynamics simulation became mostly used to study the dislocation activities at the interface.