Corrosion Behavior of Pipeline Steel under Deposit Corrosion and the Inhibition Performance of Organic Phosphine Inhibitor

Xu Yunze,Huang Yi,Ying Liang,Yang Fei,Li Bing,Wang Xiaona
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11900/0412.1961.2015.00327
IF: 1.797
2016-01-01
ACTA METALLURGICA SINICA
Abstract:Localized corrosion such as pitting and mesa attack caused by the presence of solid deposits on a metal surface is defined as under deposit corrosion (UDC). UDC is frequently observed in oil and gas transition pipelines where sand, debris biofilm and carbonate deposit are present. Studies have found that the introduction of oxygen would accelerate the galvanic corrosion behavior between the deposit covered area and the area without deposit. Some experiments have been carried out and demonstrated that high concentration inhibitor should be used for the migration of UDC. However, the inhibition effect of the organic phosphonic inhibitor for UDC is rare in the previous studies. In this work, the evaluation of UDC behavior of X65 pipeline steel and the performance of corrosion inhibitor Ethylene Diamine Tetra (Methylene Phosphonic Acid) Sodium (EDTMPS) in the oxygen contained solutions are studied by using polarization dynamic scan (PDS), electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) and linear polarization resistance (LPR) methods. The galvanic effect caused by the deposit is studied by using wire beam electrode (WBE). The measurement results show that the corrosion rate of deposit-covered electrode is lower than that of bare electrode, but localized corrosion is observed on the deposit-covered steel surface. After 35 mg/L EDT-MPS is introduced into the solution, the corrosion rate of the bare steel decreased from 0.17 mm/a to 0.082 mm/a and the corrosion rate of the deposit covered electrode decreased from 0.051 mm/a to 0.026 mm/a. Protective films are observed on both deposit covered steel surface and bare steel surface after EDTMPS added. In the galvanic corrosion monitoring experiment by using WBE, the under deposit area has a lower potential and performs as the anodic area with serious localized corrosion. After 35 mg/L EDTMPS is injected, the average potential begins to decrease. The maximum anodic current density and the total anodic current respectively decrease from 0.21 mA/cm(2) and 0.056 mA to 0.078 mA/cm(2) and 0.021 mA. The electrochemical measurement results reveal that EDTMPS has an excellent inhibition effect for the corrosion of both bare electrode and deposit covered electrode. The WBE test illustrates that EDTMPS also has an inhibition effect on the galvanic corrosion caused by the covering deposit. However, EDTMPS cannot completely prevent the localized corrosion behavior on WBE surface.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?