Abstract:Existing literature on China’s Performance Evaluation System and how it shapes cadre behavior tends to assume a hierarchy of work targets either through the framework of soft targets, hard targets, and priority targets with veto power or through target measurability. However, this traditional conceptualization of target hierarchy can no longer capture the nature of content of today’s Performance Evaluation System nor can it explain cadre behavior under the new economic and political order imposed by Xi Jinping. Based on field research conducted in various administrative level localities of four provinces during 2014, 2016, and 2017, I argue that today’s Performance Evaluation System has evolved into an increasingly balanced system driven by three prevailing features: the diminishing hard/soft targets dichotomy, the much more constrained power of priority targets with veto power, and the comprehensive quantification of evaluation targets. This study contributes to an updated understanding of the incentive mechanism of the Performance Evaluation System and how that can help explain cadre behavior today. The findings of the research have important political and economic implications on the Xi administration and the Communist Party.

The Sisyphean Fate of Government-Wide Performance Accountability Reforms

The Sisyphean Fate of Government-Wide Performance Accountability Reforms: Federal Performance Management Efforts and Employees' Daily Work, 2002-2008

Accountability and Motivation

Examining the effects of a performance management reform on employee attitudes and organizational climate

Linking Management Reform with Employee Job Satisfaction: Evidence from Federal Agencies

Managerial Effectiveness of Government Performance Measurement: Testing a Middle‐Range Model

“Honor List” and “shame Roll”: Quasi-Experimental Evidence of the Effect of Performance Feedback under Political Control

How Do Perceived Political Environment and Administrative Reform Affect Employee Commitment

External Accountability vs Internal Control:On the Orientations of Government Performance Measurement

Reassessing the Performance Evaluation System in the Xi Jinping Era: Changes and Implications

Four Challenges to Accountability in Contemporary Public Administration: Lessons From the United States and China

The Reinvention of Public Personnel Administration: An Analysis of the Diffusion of Personnel Management Reforms in the States

Examining Perceived Honest Performance Reporting by Public Organizations: Bureaucratic Politics and Organizational Practice

Bounded rationality, blame avoidance, and political accountability: how performance information influences management quality

The politics of performance measurement in China

Accountability, Career Incentives, and Pollution: The Case Of Two Control Zones in China

“Good” and “Bad” Control in Public Administration: The Impact of Performance Evaluation Systems on Employees’ Trust in the Employer

Influence Activities and Favoritism in Subjective Performance Evaluation: Evidence from Chinese State-Owned Enterprises

Does Power Corrupt? An Empirical Study of Power, Accountability, and Performance Triangle in Public Administration

Future Prospects for Performance Management in Chinese City Governments

Public Responsiveness of Government Organizations: Testing a Preliminary Model