Abstract:Private international law,an indivisible part of each legal system,should have the same dignity and value as any other legal field.Consequently,conflict rules should be applied by judges ex officio rather than at the mercy of the parties.Neither the dispositive principle nor the adversarial principle nor a practical caring for the procedural interests of parties provides a strong argu ment for the facultative application of conflict rules.From the perspective of procedural law, however,the related rules of civil procedure should be taken into consideration in the analysis of the application mode of conflict rules. When the conflict rules are applied by judges ex officio,it is the judges' responsibility to disclose to the parties any information about the related conflict rules and the applicable law referred to.On the other hand,the parties should bear the duty to prove foreign law.The procedural interests of both parties will be best protected by this approach.The ex of ficio application of conflict rules does not mean any mandatory application of foreign law which conflict rules refer to.This mode does not neglect the will of parties on whether to apply foreign law,nor does it disregard the weighing of the costs and gains of applying foreign law by parties. The ex of ficio application of conflict rules is proximately a "procedural process".Its crucial function or purpose is that,when conflict rules or the applicable foreign law does not invoked by the parties initiatively,judges will disclose the law application problem to the parties and urge them to think it carefully.Consequently,the parties' right to apply foreign law will not be renounced due to their ignorance,incompetence or negligence.This mode will mostly protect the parties' rights under both international private law and substantive law. To make it clear to accept the ex of ficio application of conflict rules,which denotes to regard foreign legal systems as equal to ourselves and protect international private law order on conflict law rather than lex fori,will serve as a symbol of the magnanimity which China should show to the outside world as a great power.

The Principle of Non-Interference and Its Application in Practices of Contemporary International Law

China Debates the Non-Interference Principle

The Logic of Contingency in China’s Insistence on the Non-interference Principle

That Is Not Intervention; That Is Interference with Chinese Characteristics: New Concepts, Distinctions and Approaches Developing in the Chinese Debate and Foreign and Security Policy Practice

Reconstructing Norms of International Interventions

On the Principle of Superior Responsibility in the International Criminal Law

On People's Loyalty to Nation and State's Protection:Comprehension and Application of the Principle of Nationality

The Principle of Prudence in International Politics:Sources of Thought and Its Implications for Theory and Practice

On the Establishment of the Principle of Individual Criminal Responsibility in the International Criminal Law

The Law of International Human Rights Protection

The Nature of Enforcement of R2P by the United Nations: from Political Responsibility to Legal Obligation

On the Principle of Objective and Considerate Obligation

On the Application of Principle of ‘Nemo Tenetur Se Ipsum Accusare’ to Administrative Investigation

The Application of General Principles of Law to Arbitrability in International Commercial Arbitration

Discussion on Autonomy Principle in Law of the Application of Law for Foreign Civil Relations

The Idea of State Sovereignty and the Right of Humanitarian Intervention

China and the Responsibility to Protect

Applicability of Principle of Good Faith in Civil Action

The Protection of Aliens from Discrimination and World Public Order: Responsibility of States Conjoined with Human Rights

The history of establishing the principle of nondiscrimination in public international law

Application Mode of Conflict Rule from the Perspective of Civil Procedure