Party Autonomy and Conflict of laws in Real Property
Song Xiao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6728.2012.01.008
2012-01-01
Abstract:The Law of the PRC on the Laws Applicable to Foreign-Related Civil Relations stipulates that the principle of party autonomy shall be the first to be applicable to real property over movables.Being a very future-oriented provision from the perspective of comparative law,it has aroused heated discussions among academic community.Though the lex situs rule had prevailed over the lex domicilii rule,thus,became the basic rule of conflict of laws in real property in the 19th century,yet from the perspective of conflict of laws in foreign-related real property,it had overemphasized the independence of real property while overlooked the intrinsic relationship between real property and obligation.In the realm of civil law,real property refers to jus in re directed at the unspecified third party,without the distinction between bilateral and trilateral real property relationships.However,in private international law,there exists such kind of relationship,in which the bilateral relationship of real property over movables should follow the principle of party autonomy,so to maintain the intrinsic link between real property and obligation in one transaction to the maximum.In a transaction relating to movables,the part autonomy for the applicable law to the contract can be constructed as the autonomy for the applicable law to real property if without contrary intention expressed by the party concerned.The relevant provisions set forth in the Law of the PRC on the laws Applicable to Foreign-Related Civil Relations should be interpreted restrictively.The principle of party autonomy in conflict of laws in real property,as a useful complementary way to the lex situs without any prejudice to the third party's interests,should not replace the basic role played by the lex situs rule.