Comparative life cycle assessment and economic analysis of methanol/hydrogen production processes for fuel cell vehicles

Wei Wu,Ching-Ting Pai,Karthickeyan Viswanathan,Jo-Shu Chang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126959
IF: 11.1
2021-06-01
Journal of Cleaner Production
Abstract:<p>The life cycle assessment (LCA) of hydrogen/methanol production processes connected with hydrogen fuel cell vehicle (HFCV) and methanol reformer-embedded fuel cell vehicle (MRFCV) are addressed. According to the scope definition of well-to-wheel and the four steps of LCA methodology, the ReCiPe endpoint score of the natural gas-fed methanol production process named by SC1<sub>MeOH</sub> is up to 2.06 kPt, which is higher than the natural gas-fed hydrogen production process called SC2<sub>H2</sub> by 50.3%. The new biomethanol production process termed by SC3<sub>MeOH</sub>, which is a combination of anaerobic co-digestion, microalgae production process, and combined heat and power (CHP), is validated to reduce the environmental impact of SC1<sub>MeOH</sub> by 93.6% due to wheat straw (waste) and microalgae as inlet sources, almost zero air pollutants, 58% carbons stored in the soil of the wheatland, and no grid supply. A comparative LCA shows that the MRFCV connected with SC3<sub>MeOH</sub> is lower than the HFCV associated with SC2<sub>H2</sub> by 40%. The Levelized cost of methanol (LCOM) for SC3<sub>MeOH</sub> (about 3.08USD/kgMeOH) is higher than SC1<sub>MeOH</sub> by 18.6%. These comparisons show that the MRFCV connected with SC3<sub>MeOH</sub> is an HFVC for green cars due to relatively low investments in storage facilities and transport and minimum environmental impacts.</p>
environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology,engineering, environmental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?