Well-to-wheel analysis of energy consumption, greenhouse gas and air pollutants emissions of hydrogen fuel cell vehicle in China

Qun Wang,Mianqiang Xue,Bin-Le Lin,Zhongfang Lei,Zhenya Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123061

IF: 11.1

2020-12-01

Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract:<p>Hydrogen fuel cell vehicle (HFCV) is considered as a promising solution for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) and air pollutants emissions and improving energy security in transportation sector. This study presents a well-to-wheel (WTW) analysis to estimate the WTW fossil fuel consumption, GHG emission and air pollutants emissions of VOCs, CO, NO_x, SO_x, PM_2.5 and PM₁₀ for HFCV under 12 hydrogen pathways in China for the current (2017) and near future (2030). The results were compared with the gasoline-fueled internal combustion engine vehicle (gasoline-ICEV) and battery electric vehicle (BEV) counterparts. The results show that HFCV can reduce 11-92% fossil fuel consumption compared with gasoline-ICEV <a class="workspace-trigger" href="#bib12">IEA, 2017</a>, with one exception that HFCV based on on-site water electrolysis by grid electricity in which fossil fuel consumption increased by 10% instead. Compared with BEV, HFCV based on by-product hydrogen from chlor-alkali process and renewable water electrolysis have the fossil fuel consumption reduction benefits. Regarding GHG emissions, HFCV based on water electrolysis using the renewable electricity performs the best with a value of 31 g CO₂-eq/km while that based on on-site water electrolysis using grid electricity performs the worst with a value of 431 g CO₂-eq/km <a class="workspace-trigger" href="#bib12">IEA, 2017</a>. For air pollutants, HFCV based on all hydrogen pathways can achieve a significant reduction of VOCs and CO emissions on a WTW basis, in comparison with gasoline-ICEV <a class="workspace-trigger" href="#bib12">IEA, 2017</a>. In terms of NO_x, SO_x, PM_2.5 and PM₁₀, HFCV based on on-site water electrolysis by grid electricity electrolysis has the highest emissions due to high emission factors of the electricity generation process. Moreover, due to increased share of renewable electricity and improvement in the fuel economy, reductions in WTW fossil fuel consumption and pollutants emissions are excepted by 2030. This study indicates the importance of hydrogen production when considering the energy and environment performance of HFCV to ensure a life cycle low carbon and air pollutants emissions.</p>

environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology,engineering, environmental

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to analyze the impacts of using hydrogen fuel - cell vehicles (HFCV) on energy consumption, greenhouse gas (GHG) and air pollutant emissions in China from the well - to - wheel (WTW) perspective. Specifically, the research aims to evaluate the WTW fossil fuel consumption, GHG emissions and emissions of air pollutants such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOₓ), sulfur dioxide (SOₓ), PM₂.₅ and PM₁₀ of HFCV under different hydrogen production paths, and compare them with gasoline internal combustion engine vehicles (gasoline - ICEV) and battery electric vehicles (BEV).

Through this analysis, the researchers hope to reveal the key impacts of hydrogen production paths on emission reduction effects and emphasize the importance of including the well - to - tank (WTT) stage in the comparison. In addition, the research also aims to provide a scientific basis for China to formulate more effective emission - reduction policies in the transportation field in order to achieve better energy - saving and emission - reduction goals.

### Key problem summary:
1. **Evaluate the WTW energy consumption and emissions of HFCV under different hydrogen production paths**: including fossil fuel consumption, GHG emissions and air pollutant emissions.
2. **Comparison with traditional gasoline vehicles and electric vehicles**: understand the environmental benefits of HFCV relative to other types of vehicles.
3. **Identify key factors**: determine which hydrogen production paths are most conducive to emission reduction, and emphasize the importance of power sources and hydrogen production processes on environmental impacts.
4. **Provide support for policy - making**: provide a scientific basis for the government and relevant stakeholders to formulate more effective emission - reduction policies.

### Formulas involved:
- **Energy input calculation**:
\[
E_{\text{input}}=\frac{1}{\eta_k}
\]
where \( E_{\text{input}} \) is the energy input at a given stage (unit: MJ/MJ), and \( \eta_k \) is the energy efficiency of a given process.

- **TTW - stage energy consumption calculation**:
\[
E_{\text{TTW}, j}=\frac{\text{LHV}_j\times\rho_j}{\text{FE}_j\times100}
\]
where \( E_{\text{TTW}, j} \) is the energy consumption of fuel type \( j \) at the TTW stage (unit: kJ/km), \(\text{LHV}_j\) is the low - heat - value of fuel type \( j \) (unit: kJ/kg), \(\rho_j\) is the fuel density (unit: kg/L), and \(\text{FE}_j\) is the vehicle fuel economy (unit: L/100km).

- **WTT - stage emission calculation**:
\[
\text{EM}_{\text{WTT}, i}=\sum\sum\text{EF}_{i, j, k}\times\text{FC}_{j, k}
\]
where \(\text{EM}_{\text{WTT}, i}\) is the emission amount of pollutant \( i \) (unit: g/MJ), \(\text{EF}_{i, j, k}\) is the emission factor of pollutant \( i \) during the combustion process of fuel \( j \) using technology \( k \) (unit: g/MJ), and \(\text{FC}_{j, k}\) is the fuel consumption during the combustion process of fuel \( j \) using technology \( k \) (unit: MJ/MJ).

These formulas are used to quantify the energy consumption and emissions at different stages, so as to comprehensively evaluate the environmental impacts of HFCV.