A Comparative Study on the Oxidation of Austenitic Alloys 304 and 304-Oxide Dispersion Strengthened Steel in Supercritical Water at 650 °C

Yashar Behnamian,Amir Mostafaei,Alireza Kohandehghan,Babak Shalchi Amirkhiz,Ramin Zahiri,Wenyue Zheng,David Guzonas,Markus Chmielus,Weixing Chen,Jing Li Luo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2016.10.002
IF: 3.9
2016-01-01
The Journal of Supercritical Fluids
Abstract:This study concentrated on the investigation of oxide scale grown on alloys 304 and 304-oxide dispersion strengthened steel in supercritical water (650 degrees C/25 MPa) environment. The corrosion rate was evaluated by measuring the weight change of the samples and by cross-section examinations. Results showed that weight gains vs. supercritical exposure time follows a parabolic law for alloy 304-ODS contrary to alloy 304 which possibly follows a cubic rate law. The general weight gain after 550 h exposure to the SCW was 131.8 and 621.6 mg/dm(2) for alloys 304-ODS and 304, respectively. Electron microscopy observations and elemental analyses as well as X-ray diffraction and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry results revealed that the oxide scales formed on 304-ODS alloy composed of three distinct layers including Fe3O4 (outer layer), FeCr2O4/(Fe,Cr)(2)O-3 spinel structures (inner layer) and Cr2O3 (transition layer). However, alloy 304 had two layers including Fe3O4 (outer layer) and Fe-Cr spine] structures (inner layer). It is believed that the formation of Cr2O3 layer at the diffusion layer/metal interface becomes the rate limiting step for oxide advancement, since this change in oxide structure also corresponds to a decrease in corrosion rate in the alloy 304-ODS compared to alloy 304. Based on the results and observations, the oxidation mechanisms are discussed. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?