Abstract:In realistic world individuals with high reputation are more likely to influence the collective behaviors. Due to the cost and error of information dissemination, however, it is unreasonable to assign each individual with a complete cognitive power, which means that not everyone can accurately realize others' reputation situation. Here we introduce the mechanism of inferring reputation into the selection of potential strategy sources to explore the evolution of cooperation. Before the game each player is assigned with a randomly distributed parameter p denoting his ability to infer the reputation of others. The parameter p of each individual is kept constant during the game. The value of p indicates that the neighbor possessing highest reputation is chosen with the probability p and randomly choosing an opponent is left with the probability 1-p. We find that this novel mechanism can be seen as an universally applicable promoter of cooperation, which works on various interaction networks and in different types of evolutionary game. Of particular interest is the fact that, in the early stages of evolutionary process, cooperators with high reputation who are easily regarded as the potential strategy donors can quickly lead to the formation of extremely robust clusters of cooperators that are impervious to defector attacks. These clusters eventually help cooperators reach their undisputed dominance, which transcends what can be warranted by the spatial reciprocity alone. Moreover, we provide complete phase diagrams to depict the impact of uncertainty in strategy adoptions and conclude that the effective interaction topology structure may be altered under such a mechanism. When the estimation of reputation is extended, we also show that the moderate value of evaluation factor enables cooperation to thrive best. We thus present a viable method of understanding the ubiquitous cooperative behaviors in nature and hope that it will inspire further studies to resolve social dilemmas.

Don't Speak to Strangers: the Suspicious Strategy Can Help to Improve Cooperation in Spatial Donation Game

Cooperation and Charity in Spatial Public Goods Game under Different Strategy Update Rules

Inferring reputation promotes the evolution of cooperation in spatial social dilemma games

The evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games under a risk-transfer mechanism

Cooperation Stimulation in Cooperative Communications: an Indirect Reciprocity Game

Reputation-based Mutual Selection Rule Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Threshold Public Goods Games

Restoring spatial cooperation with myopic agents in a three-strategy social dilemma

The Evolution Of Cooperation In The Presence Of Costs Of Information Transfer

Cautious strategy update promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game

Spatial reciprocity in the evolution of cooperation.

Spatial Structure Favors Cooperative Behavior in the Snowdrift Game with Multiple Interactive Dynamics

The evolution of cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma games with heterogeneous relationships

Effects of Reciprocal Rewarding on the Evolution of Cooperation in Voluntary Social Dilemmas

Influentials Promote Cooperation in Spatial Snowdrift Games

Cooperation Stimulation in Cognitive Networks Using Indirect Reciprocity Game Modelling.

Social Stratification and Cooperative Behavior in Spatial Prisoners' Dilemma Games

Super-rational aspiration induced strategy updating promotes cooperation in the asymmetric prisoner's dilemma game

Multiple effect of social influence on cooperation in interdependent network games

Emergence of Social Cooperation in Threshold Public Goods Games with Collective Risk.

Rational conformity behavior in social learning promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game

Social Influence Promotes Cooperation in the Public Goods Game