Abstract:In realistic world individuals with high reputation are more likely to influence the collective behaviors. Due to the cost and error of information dissemination, however, it is unreasonable to assign each individual with a complete cognitive power, which means that not everyone can accurately realize others' reputation situation. Here we introduce the mechanism of inferring reputation into the selection of potential strategy sources to explore the evolution of cooperation. Before the game each player is assigned with a randomly distributed parameter p denoting his ability to infer the reputation of others. The parameter p of each individual is kept constant during the game. The value of p indicates that the neighbor possessing highest reputation is chosen with the probability p and randomly choosing an opponent is left with the probability 1-p. We find that this novel mechanism can be seen as an universally applicable promoter of cooperation, which works on various interaction networks and in different types of evolutionary game. Of particular interest is the fact that, in the early stages of evolutionary process, cooperators with high reputation who are easily regarded as the potential strategy donors can quickly lead to the formation of extremely robust clusters of cooperators that are impervious to defector attacks. These clusters eventually help cooperators reach their undisputed dominance, which transcends what can be warranted by the spatial reciprocity alone. Moreover, we provide complete phase diagrams to depict the impact of uncertainty in strategy adoptions and conclude that the effective interaction topology structure may be altered under such a mechanism. When the estimation of reputation is extended, we also show that the moderate value of evaluation factor enables cooperation to thrive best. We thus present a viable method of understanding the ubiquitous cooperative behaviors in nature and hope that it will inspire further studies to resolve social dilemmas.

Influentials Promote Cooperation in Spatial Snowdrift Games

Multiple effect of social influence on cooperation in interdependent network games

The Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Multigame with Voluntary Participation

Complex interactions promote the frequency of cooperation in snowdrift game

Influencer Propagation Model Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Game

Multi-games on Interdependent Networks and the Evolution of Cooperation

Harmful strong agents and asymmetric interaction can promote the frequency of cooperation in the snowdrift game

Spatial Structure Favors Cooperative Behavior in the Snowdrift Game with Multiple Interactive Dynamics

Social Influence Promotes Cooperation in the Public Goods Game

Multigames with Voluntary Participation on Interdependent Networks and the Evolution of Cooperation

The Effect Of Multigame On Cooperation In Spatial Network

Invasion and expansion of cooperators in lattice populations: Prisoner's dilemma vs. snowdrift games

Effect of Growing Size of Interaction Neighbors on the Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Snowdrift Game

Preferential selection to promote cooperation on degree–degree correlation networks in spatial snowdrift games

Understanding Cooperative Behavior of Agents with Heterogeneous Perceptions in Dynamic Networks

Effects of Reciprocal Rewarding on the Evolution of Cooperation in Voluntary Social Dilemmas

Evolution of cooperation in a heterogeneous population with influential individuals

Strategy Imitation Behavior Driven Influence Adjustment Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Prisoner's Dilemma Game

Social diversity promotes cooperation in spatial multigames

Heterogeneity Improves Cooperation in Continuous Snowdrift Game

Inferring reputation promotes the evolution of cooperation in spatial social dilemma games