Abstract:In realistic world individuals with high reputation are more likely to influence the collective behaviors. Due to the cost and error of information dissemination, however, it is unreasonable to assign each individual with a complete cognitive power, which means that not everyone can accurately realize others' reputation situation. Here we introduce the mechanism of inferring reputation into the selection of potential strategy sources to explore the evolution of cooperation. Before the game each player is assigned with a randomly distributed parameter p denoting his ability to infer the reputation of others. The parameter p of each individual is kept constant during the game. The value of p indicates that the neighbor possessing highest reputation is chosen with the probability p and randomly choosing an opponent is left with the probability 1-p. We find that this novel mechanism can be seen as an universally applicable promoter of cooperation, which works on various interaction networks and in different types of evolutionary game. Of particular interest is the fact that, in the early stages of evolutionary process, cooperators with high reputation who are easily regarded as the potential strategy donors can quickly lead to the formation of extremely robust clusters of cooperators that are impervious to defector attacks. These clusters eventually help cooperators reach their undisputed dominance, which transcends what can be warranted by the spatial reciprocity alone. Moreover, we provide complete phase diagrams to depict the impact of uncertainty in strategy adoptions and conclude that the effective interaction topology structure may be altered under such a mechanism. When the estimation of reputation is extended, we also show that the moderate value of evaluation factor enables cooperation to thrive best. We thus present a viable method of understanding the ubiquitous cooperative behaviors in nature and hope that it will inspire further studies to resolve social dilemmas.

Social Influence Promotes Cooperation in the Public Goods Game

Cooperation and Charity in Spatial Public Goods Game under Different Strategy Update Rules

Adaptive and Bounded Investment Returns Promote Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Games

Selective Investment Promotes Cooperation in Public Goods Game

The Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Groups

When multi-group selection meets mystery of cooperation in structured public goods games

Evolution of Cooperation in Spatio-Temporal Evolutionary Games with Public Goods Feedback

A Strategy Adaptive Evolution Approach Based on the Public Goods Game

Social Selection of Game Organizers Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Games

Individual's expulsion to nasty environment promotes cooperation in public goods games

Do not aim too high nor too low: Moderate expectation-based group formation promotes public cooperation on networks

Evolution of Public Cooperation with Weighted and Conditional Strategies

Inferring reputation promotes the evolution of cooperation in spatial social dilemma games

Coevolutionary dynamics of aspiration and strategy in spatial repeated public goods games

Promotion of cooperation induced by the interplay between structure and game dynamics

Reputation-based Mutual Selection Rule Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Threshold Public Goods Games

Coevolution of Strategy and Structure on Social Networks

Effect of heterogeneous investments on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods game.

Diversity of contribution promotes cooperation in public goods games

The evolution of cooperation in the public goods game on the scale-free community networks under multiple strategy updating rules

Diversity of Game Strategies Promotes the Evolution of Cooperation in Public Goods Games