Abstract:In real situations, individuals often have moderate tolerance toward ambient cooperative environment in which they tend to avoid unfavorable interactions and search for favorable ones. How such social tolerance affects the evolution of cooperation and the resulting cooperative networks remains to be answered. To address this issue, here we present an effective model of co-evolutionary prisoner's dilemma by introducing cooperative environment and social tolerance for networked players. An individual's level of cooperative environment characterizes the cooperativity and sustainability of its interaction environment centered on itself. In our model, for paired individuals we assume that the one in better cooperative environment has a certain tolerance threshold to the opponent. If the opponent's cooperative environment level is beyond the tolerance threshold, the one in better cooperative environment cuts unilaterally the link, and rewires to others. Otherwise, the link is not severed, and meanwhile an inhomogeneous strategy imitation process between them is considered. Moreover, a player's cooperative environment is adjusted in response to the strategy choices in the neighborhood. Interestingly, we find that there exists a moderate tolerance threshold warranting the best promotion of cooperation. We explain the nontrivial results by investigating the time ratio of strategy (network) updating during the whole process and properties in emerging networks. Furthermore, we investigate the effect of memory-dependent discounting of individuals' cooperative environment on the evolution of cooperation. We also demonstrate the robustness of our results by considering two other modified co-evolutionary rules. Our results highlight the importance of appropriate tolerance threshold for the evolution of cooperation during the entangled co-evolution of strategy and structure.

Do not aim too high nor too low: Moderate expectation-based group formation promotes public cooperation on networks

Cooperation and Charity in Spatial Public Goods Game under Different Strategy Update Rules

When multi-group selection meets mystery of cooperation in structured public goods games

Expectation-Driven Migration Promotes Cooperation By Group Interactions

Cooperation in Evolutionary Games on Complex Networks.

Cooperation Enhanced By Moderate Tolerance Ranges In Myopically Selective Interactions

Partner selections in public goods games with constant group size

The Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Groups

Individual's expulsion to nasty environment promotes cooperation in public goods games

Social Influence Promotes Cooperation in the Public Goods Game

When selection pays: structured public goods game with a generalized interaction mode

Adaptive and Bounded Investment Returns Promote Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Games

Is cooperation sustained under increased mixing in evolutionary public goods games on networks?

Reputation-based Mutual Selection Rule Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Threshold Public Goods Games

Promotion of cooperation induced by the interplay between structure and game dynamics

Selective Investment Promotes Cooperation in Public Goods Game

The evolution of cooperation in public goods games on the scale-free community network under multiple strategy-updating rules

Moderate Intra-Group Bias Maximizes Cooperation on Interdependent Populations.

Interdependent network reciprocity in evolutionary games

Social Tolerance Allows Cooperation To Prevail In An Adaptive Environment

Coevolving agent strategies and network topology for the public goods games