Abstract:Motion is a typical reaction among animals and humans trying to reach better conditions in a changing world. This aspect has been studied intensively in social dilemmas where competing players' individual and collective interests are in conflict. Starting from the traditional public goods game model, where players are locally fixed and unconditional cooperators or defectors are present, we introduce two additional strategies through which agents can change their positions of dependence on the local cooperation level. More importantly, these so-called sophisticated players should bear an extra cost to maintain their permanent capacity to evaluate their neighborhood and react accordingly. Hence, four strategies compete, and the most successful one can be imitated by its neighbors. Crucially, the introduction of costly movement has a highly biased consequence on the competing main strategies. In the majority of parameter space, it is harmful to defectors and provides a significantly higher cooperation level when the population is rare. At an intermediate population density, which would be otherwise optimal for a system of immobile players, the presence of mobile actors could be detrimental if the interaction pattern changes slightly, thereby blocking the optimal percolation of information flow. In this parameter space, sophisticated cooperators can also show the co-called Moor effect by first avoiding the harmful vicinity of defectors; they subsequently transform into an immobile cooperator state. Hence, paradoxically, the additional cost of movement could be advantageous to reach a higher general income, especially for a rare population when subgroups would be isolated otherwise.

Expectation-Driven Migration Promotes Cooperation By Group Interactions

Cooperation and Charity in Spatial Public Goods Game under Different Strategy Update Rules

Evolution of Cooperation among Game Players with Non-Uniform Migration Scopes

Environment-driven migration enhances cooperation in evolutionary public goods games

Migration based on historical payoffs promotes cooperation in continuous two-dimensional space

Moving Away From Nasty Encounters Enhances Cooperation In Ecological Prisoner'S Dilemma Game

Do not aim too high nor too low: Moderate expectation-based group formation promotes public cooperation on networks

Role of Adaptive Migration in Promoting Cooperation in Spatial Games.

Evolution Of Cooperation Driven By Reputation-Based Migration

When costly migration helps to improve cooperation

Adaptive long-range migration promotes cooperation under tempting conditions

The Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Groups

Risk-driven migration and the collective-risk social dilemma

Leaving bads provides better outcome than approaching goods in a social dilemma

Effect of mixed random and directional migration on cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma

Individual's expulsion to nasty environment promotes cooperation in public goods games

Migration costs and rewarding schemes in spatial public goods games

Promotion of cooperation induced by the interplay between structure and game dynamics

Does migration cost influence cooperation among success-driven individuals?

Coupled dynamics of mobility and pattern formation in optional public goods games

Adaptive and Bounded Investment Returns Promote Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Games