Abstract:The number of elderly people receiving treatment for coronary artery disease (CAD) is increasing, and there are few studies that compared the outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the elderly. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of CABG and PCI in octogenarians with CAD.We conducted a search to identify articles that reported the results of 2-arm studies that compared CABG with PCI in octogenarians. The primary outcomes were short-term mortality and overall survival, and secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay and cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and myocardial infarction (MI) rates.Seven studies that enrolled 1879 patients who received CABG and 1432 treated with PCI were included. Short-term mortality was significantly less for patients in the PCI arms (odds ratio [OR], 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-2.06; P = 0.02), as was duration of hospital stay (difference in means, 6.07; 95% CI, 2.81-9.34; P < 0.001). Patients in the CABG arms had longer overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.73-0.89; P < 0.001). CVA and MI rates were similar (CVA: OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.57-1.95; P = 0.86; MI: OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.42-1.17; P = 0.17).The results suggest that physicians should consider not only the clinical features of CAD, but also the elderly patients future health outlook when choosing a revascularization procedure.

Clinical Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting vs Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Octogenarians With Coronary Artery Disease.