Coronary artery bypass grafting in octogenarians: an Australian experience

Liam Bibo,Joshua Goldblatt,Ryan Cohen,Chris Merry,Robert Larbalestier
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.18902
IF: 1.7
2024-02-17
ANZ Journal of Surgery
Abstract:The aims of this study were to describe early and mid‐term morbidity and mortality in octogenarian patients undergoing CABG, to determine if outcomes are comparable to younger patients undergoing the same procedure. Despite an increase in post‐operative morbidity and LOS, there was no difference in hospital readmission, in‐hospital mortality or 1 year mortality in octogenarian patients who underwent CABG. CABG is safe and remains an important management option for these patients. Background The aims of this study were to describe early and mid‐term morbidity and mortality in octogenarian patients undergoing CABG, to determine if outcomes are comparable to younger patients undergoing the same procedure. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of the first 901 patients who underwent cardiac surgery at a large newly established tertiary hospital in Western Australia from February 2015 to September 2019. Inclusion criteria involved all patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Exclusion criteria included patients who underwent concomitant valve or aortic procedure. Results From a cohort of 901 patients, 37 octogenarian patients underwent CABG. Octogenarian patients had a higher rate of post‐operative transfusion 35.1% versus 21.4% (P = 0.048), a higher rate of post‐op acute kidney injury 40.5% versus 17.2% (P
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?