Clinical Outcome in Octogenarians with Acute Coronary Syndrome after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

钱菊英,吴鸿谊,张峰,葛雷,樊冰,王齐兵,刘学波,葛均波
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-0126.2007.06.007
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objectives:To evaluate the safety and eficacy of primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)in patients with acute coronary syndrome(ACS) over 75 years old.Methods:The data of patients who were underwent PC1 during April 2005 to April 2008 were analyzed retrospectively.They were divided into the elderly acute coronary syndrome(ACS) group(≥75 years,n=108) and the younger group(75years,n=176).The immediate success rate and major adverse cardiac events(MACE) in two groups were analyzed during in-hospital duration and follow-up period.Results:Compared with the younger group,the elder group were likely to have multi-vessels lesions.The time of procedure was longer in elder group than in the younger group.There was no significant on the immediate success rate and the rate of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction(TIMI)flow 3 between two groups.Compared with the younger group,the incidence of MACE were higher in elder group during in-hospital and follow-up period,too.Conclusions:PCI is also a relatively safe and effective reperfusion method in elder patients with ACS.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?