Microstructure, generation of intermetallic compounds and mechanical strengthening mechanism of as-cast Mg–4Y–xZn alloys
Huanjian Xie,Zili Liu,Xiqin Liu,Fang Liu,Yong Shi,Xinchen Wu,Jian Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.139948
2020-10-01
Abstract:<p>The performance of as-cast Mg–4Y–<em>x</em>Zn (<em>x</em> = 1, 2, 3, and 4 wt%) alloys with adding different content of Zn is thoroughly investigated. Results show that the alloy system mainly contains Mg<sub>24</sub>Y<sub>5</sub>, Mg<sub>12</sub>YZn (X), and Mg<sub>3</sub>Y<sub>2</sub>Zn<sub>3</sub> (W) phases. During the solidification process, with a Zn content of more than 1 wt%, the Mg<sub>24</sub>Y<sub>5</sub> content gradually decreases and ultimately disappears, and the W-phase increases. The increase of Zn content account for the decrease of lattice parameters and volume of the α-Mg matrix. The yield strength and ultimate tensile strength of the Mg–4Y–<em>x</em>Zn alloy increase with the Zn content varies from 1 to 4 wt%; the favorable values are 122 and 232 MPa. Moreover, the elongation first increases and then decreases; the optimal value is 11.9% as the Zn content reaches 3 wt%. For the alloy system, X-phase is the major strengthening phase owing to its 18R long-period stacking ordered structure; moreover, it has a crystallographic relationship of (0001)<sub>Mg</sub>//(001)<sub>18R</sub> and [<span class="math"><math>1¯21¯</math></span>0]<sub>Mg</sub>//[010]<sub>18R</sub> with the Mg matrix. Indeed, the tiny W-phase can cooperate with the X-phase in order to enhance the performance of the material in question by inhibiting X-phase deformation during the tensile process. Nevertheless, if W-phase is the only second phase in the alloy, the ductility of the alloy is reduced.</p>
materials science, multidisciplinary,nanoscience & nanotechnology,metallurgy & metallurgical engineering