Abstract:I examine the effect of relative performance evaluation (RPE) on firm performance and risk-taking behavior. Agency theory suggests that, for firms that experience common shocks, RPE in executive compensation plans improves risk sharing and strengthens incentive alignment by providing more information about managerial effort than firm performance alone. In practice (i.e., in the presence of a finite number of peers), RPE effectiveness depends on the extent of firms’ common risk exposure and the amount of common risk captured by RPE peers. I develop a simple model that predicts that the benefit of using RPE exceeds the cost of adding noise from peers when the amount of common risk removed is large. Consistent with predictions, I find empirically that RPE firms perform better than similar non-RPE firms when there is high common risk exposure and the common risk removed by the selected peers is high. I also find that, in these circumstances, the use of RPE is associated with greater firm risk and a lower likelihood of underinvesting. Overall, my study provides evidence that RPE is associated with better risk sharing and stronger incentive alignment when (1) RPE firms are exposed to high common risk and (2) RPE peers are effective in removing common risk for performance evaluation. This paper was accepted by Brian Bushee, accounting. Funding: I gratefully acknowledge financial support from Texas A&M University and the University of Colorado Boulder. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4764 .

Board Interlock Networks and the Use of Relative Performance Evaluation

CEOs Versus Members’ Evaluation of Cooperative Performance: Evidence from China

Interlocking Directorate and Firm’s Diversification Strategy: Perspective of Strategy Learning

Effects of CEO Identity on Non-family Managers’ Pay Dispersion in Family Firms: A Social Comparison Perspective

Governance, CEO Power, and Relative Performance Evaluation Effectiveness

Board Network,Governance Role of Independent Directors and Executive Incentives

On the Director Compensation, CEO Compensation and Firm's Performance

CEO Compensation and Relative Company Performance Evaluation

Relative Performance Evaluation and Executive Compensation: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

The Role of Common Risk in the Effectiveness of Explicit Relative Performance Evaluation

Rocking the Boat: How Relative Performance Evaluation Affects Corporate Risk Taking

Ties that bind: exploring corporate networks, decision-making dynamics in the financial market, labor-management relations, and organizational performance

Chief executive officer compensation, firm performance, and strategic coopetition: A seemingly unrelated regression approach

Organizations' Risk-taking and Performance Shortfalls:Moderating Role of Board Network Position

Effort allocation and governance effect of multiple-board independent directors: evidence from reputation and geographic proximity

The Independent Board Requirement and CEO Connectedness

Executive Network Centrality and Corporate Reporting

CEO duality and firm performance: A systematic review and research agenda

Board interlocks and corporate risk-taking: An empirical analysis of listed companies from tourism and related industries in China

Analysis of the Connection Between Executive Remuneration and Corporate Fiscal Achievement

The influence mechanism of interlocking director network on corporate risk-taking from the perspective of network embeddedness: Evidence from China