Abstract:Purpose Existing literature in experimental accounting research suggests that accounting professionals and people with accounting backgrounds tend to have a lower level of moral reasoning and ethical development. Motivated by these findings, this paper aims to examine whether chief executive officers (CEOs) with accounting backgrounds have an impact on firms’ earnings management behavior and the level of accounting conservatism. Design/methodology/approach The authors classify CEOs into those with and without accounting backgrounds using BoardEx data. Using discretionary accruals from several different models, they do not find that CEOs with accounting backgrounds are more likely to engage in income-increasing accruals. However, the authors find that CEOs with accounting backgrounds exhibit lower levels of conservatism, proxied by C-scores and T-scores (Basu, 1997). This finding suggests that CEOs with accounting backgrounds recognize bad news more quickly than good news, consistent with the accounting principle of “anticipating all losses but anticipating no gains”. Findings The authors show that firms whose CEOs have accounting backgrounds exhibit lower levels of accounting conservatism. However, these firms do not exhibit higher levels of income-increasing discretionary accruals. This study documents the impact of CEOs’ educational backgrounds on firms’ accounting choices and confirms prior findings in experimental accounting research using large sample archival data. Originality/value This paper is the first study that investigates the impact of CEOs’ accounting backgrounds on firms’ financial reporting policy. The findings may have some policy implications. If accounting backgrounds of CEOs can make a significant difference on firms’ behavior, it is reasonable to make CEOs accountable for the quality of financial reporting. This paper is one of the first to empirically test inferences drawn by experimental accounting research. There has been a gap between archival and experimental accounting studies. The authors propose that interesting research questions can be addressed by filling in such a gap.

Executive Network Centrality and Corporate Reporting

How Board Faultlines Affect Board Effectiveness in Monitoring

Executive network centrality and corporate merger and acquisition efficiency: A governance effect or collusion effect?

How Boards’ Factional Faultlines Affect Corporate Financial Fraud

Supervision or collusion? CEO–CFO social ties and financial reporting quality

Noncontrolling shareholders' network centrality and corporate earnings management: Governance or conspiracy?

Boardroom Centrality and Systematic Risk

Network Centrality and Dissent Voting by Directors on Boards

Board Interlock Networks and the Use of Relative Performance Evaluation

Executive Network Centrality and Stock Liquidity

Centrality in the Global Network of Corporate Control

The Impact of CEOs’ Accounting Backgrounds on Earnings Management and Conservatism

Impact of Directors’ Network on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from China

Social capital and cost of debt: Evidence from Chinese CEO network centrality

CEO Connectedness Within Executive Suites and Corporate Frauds

CEO Connectedness and Firm Transparency

The Path to Reporting Economic Reality - Why All CEOs Should Have Accounting Degrees

Chief Financial Officer Demographic Characteristics and Fraudulent Financial Reporting in China

Board of directors network centrality and environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance

The Mechanisms of Chief Executive Officer Characteristics and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting: Evidence From Chinese-Listed Firms

Alliance Termination after Corporate Misconduct: an Integrated Model of Power and Scrutiny Effects