Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this study is to show that social relations in a corporate governance platform between members of supervisory boards and between members of supervisory and executive board tiers can serve as an alternative viewpoint for understanding mechanisms of social selection in corporate governance networks. The study shows that through the lenses of social network analysis, it is possible to identify and understand how the process of corporate governance member selection unfolds within companies and how that selection process may have been potentially influenced by the cross-board relations, such as interlocking directorships. Design/methodology/approach To estimate network parameters and attribute effects of network tie emergence, this study has used exponential random graph models (ERGMs) on corporate governance data of Danish publicly listed companies. Econometric models are applied to estimate parameter statistics which serve further to explain tendencies of tie emergence. Findings The results of this study reveal that the process of selection of both supervisory boards and executive directors is interdependent. Also, the study showed that board members are more likely to select popular supervisory board members and top managers who have their expertise gained through multiple companies affiliated with multiple industries. However, these conditions for CEO selection apply only to the extent to which they have their experience gained from multiple companies but not multiple industries. Originality/value On one hand, this study demonstrates that being a dynamic practitioner who is exposed to diverse corporate environments by being affiliated with different companies belonging to different industries generally increases practitioners visibility in the corporate governance network, and therefore their attractiveness to boards of directors. On the other hand, the results show that the research on board assemblage, nowadays, should be rather observed through the methodology of social network analysis as the method gives an opportunity to understand structures through relations, from which the executive tier should not be exempted as well.

Ties that bind: exploring corporate networks, decision-making dynamics in the financial market, labor-management relations, and organizational performance

Corporate Board Network Ties and Corporate Social Performance Alignment

CEO-CFO Educational Ties and Mergers and Acquisitions

A tiger with wings: CEO-board surname ties and agency costs

CEO Connectedness and Firm Transparency

Interlocking Directorate,Financial Performance and Firm Value

Supervision or collusion? CEO–CFO social ties and financial reporting quality

Structure behind principles: social selection mechanisms in corporate governance networks

Board of directors network centrality and environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance

Board Interlock Networks and the Use of Relative Performance Evaluation

Dual class shares, board of directors’ effectiveness and firm’s market value: an empirical study

Board Long-Term Orientation, Earnings Management, Disclosure and Risk

Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Financial Performance: An Analysis of Listed Companies in Brazil

Corporate Social Responsibility and Governance: The Role of Executive Compensation

Corporate governance: Assessing corporate performance by boardroom attributes

CEO duality and firm performance: A systematic review and research agenda

Too Comfortable in the Saddle? the Effect of CEO Tenure on Board Attributions of Poor Performance

Analysis of the Connection Between Executive Remuneration and Corporate Fiscal Achievement

CEO social capital, risk-taking and corporate policies

Corporate social network and corporate social responsibility: A perspective of interlocking directorates

Corporate Governance and Financial Performance: a literature Review of Measurements and Econometric Methods of Data Analysis in Research