Abstract:the past two decades, increasing the influence of common shareholders has become a touchstone of good governance and shareholder democracy across the globe. Institutional activism combined with major regulatory overhauls has led shareholders to play a more active role in corporate decision-making. Yet, there are only a handful of studies that examine the role of corporate governance on a CEO’s opportunity costs to sell her holdings. In this paper, we provide evidence that quality of governance helps to explain a significant amount of variation in CEO ownership and the compensation structure. We argue that exogenous improvements in governance standards reduce the CEO’s costs to sell her shares because the market puts a higher weight on liquidity-related sales relative to private information-related sales. We find that CEO ownership level is strongly negatively related to the quality of corporate governance. Further, we argue that higher liquidation of shareholdings lowers the CEO’s wealth-performance sensitivity; hence, the compensation committee needs to give more incentive compensation to keep the wealth-performance sensitivity at the optimal level. We find that CEO incentive intensity is positively associated with the quality of corporate governance. Thus, we find that CEOs get more stakes in the firm, but CEOs choose to hold a lower stake in their portfolio. We use the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (henceforth, SOX) as a quasi-natural experiment to mitigate the causality concern between corporate governance, CEO’s stick ownership, and compensation structure. As a robustness test, we check that CEOs, under good governance, have higher yearly share sales. This effect is positively related to CEOs' tenure and negatively related to the size of the firm. However, we show that even if they earn higher incentive compensation, CEOs with lower stock ownership have lower wealth-performance sensitivity compared to CEOs with higher stock ownership. Our results have important implications for contracting mechanisms related to mitigating agency problems.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Governance: The Role of Executive Compensation

The influence of corporate governance and shareholding structure on corporate social responsibility: The key role of executive compensation

Empirical examination of the direct and moderating role of corporate social responsibility in top executive compensation

Executive compensation linked to corporate social responsibility and firm risk

The moderating role of good corporate governance on the relationship between corporate social responsibility and real earnings management

Corporate governance and financial performance: Reframing their relationship in the context of climate change

The impact of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility at the board-level: A critical assessment

Governance and Incentives: Is It Really All about the Money?

CEO behavior and sustainability performance: the moderating role of corporate governance

Corporate governance and executive compensation: do they impact on operating performance and valuation of real estate firms?

Does corporate governance moderate the effect of corporate social responsibility on a firm’s financial performance?

Quality of Governance, Opportunity Costs, and CEO Compensation Structure

The determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) committee: executive compensation, CSR-based incentives and ESG performance

The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility and the Executive Compensation on Implicit Cost of Equity: Evidence from French ESG Data

The role of business strategy and CEO compensation structure in driving corporate social responsibility: Linkage towards a sustainable development perspective

The nonlinear effect of executive compensation on corporate social responsibility performance

CSR reporting, assurance, and firm value and risk: The moderating effects of CSR committees and executive compensation

Effects of Managers Compensation Structure on ESG Performance

Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance: A cognitive approach

The mediating role of corporate social responsibility in good corporate governance and firm value relationship: evidence from European financial institutions

Compensation peer effects of corporate social responsibility