Abstract:The present study, conducted immediately after the 2020 presidential election in the United States, examined whether Democrats' and Republicans' polarized assessments of election legitimacy increased over time. In a naturalistic survey experiment, people (N = 1,236) were randomly surveyed either during the week following Election Day, with votes cast but the outcome unknown, or during the following week, after President Joseph Biden was widely declared the winner. The design unconfounded the election outcome announcement from the vote itself, allowing more precise testing of predictions derived from cognitive dissonance theory. As predicted, perceived election legitimacy increased among Democrats, from the first to the second week following Election Day, as their expected Biden win was confirmed, whereas perceived election legitimacy decreased among Republicans as their expected President Trump win was disconfirmed. From the first to the second week following Election Day, Republicans reported stronger negative emotions and weaker positive emotions while Democrats reported stronger positive emotions and weaker negative emotions. The polarized perceptions of election legitimacy were correlated with the tendencies to trust and consume polarized media. Consumption of Fox News was associated with lowered perceptions of election legitimacy over time whereas consumption of other outlets was associated with higher perceptions of election legitimacy over time. Discussion centers on the role of the media in the experience of cognitive dissonance and the implications of polarized perceptions of election legitimacy for psychology, political science, and the future of democratic society.

Third-Person Effect and Hostile Media Perception Influences on Voter Attitudes Toward Polls in the 2008 Us Presidential Election

Perceived Poll Bias and Inference of Biased Poll Impact in the 2010 U . S . Midterm Elections : Media Performance in the Eyes of the Beholder

The Third-Person Effects of Political Attack Ads in the 2004 Us Presidential Election

Examining the Perceptual Gap and Behavioral Intention in the Perceived Effects of Polling News in the 2008 Taiwan Presidential Election

Political Advertising on Social Media in the 2012 Presidential Election

Ambivalent Versus Univalent Voters: Perceived Media Influences and Third-Person Perceptions

Need for Orientation and Third-Person Effects of the Televised Debates in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election

Impact of Mass Media during the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election: A Cross-Cultural Study of Stereotype Change in China and the United States

More Harm Than Good? Online Media Use and Political Disaffection Among College Students in the 2008 Election

Intraparty Hostility: Social Identity, Subidentity, and the Hostile Media Effect in a Contested Primary

Voter emotional responses and voting behaviour in the 2020 US presidential election

Third-Person Effects of Health News

Racial Attitudes and Visual Cues in Political Judgments: Support for Obama During the 2008 Presidential Election.

Evidence of Systematic Bias in 2008 Presidential Polling (preliminary report)

Election Polls on Social Media: Prevalence, Biases, and Voter Fraud Beliefs

Hostile Media or Hostile Source? Bias Perception of Shared News

The Emotional Power of Partisan Media: A Computer Vision Analysis of the 2020 Democratic Party Presidential Primaries

Research on Impact of the Third-person Effect Perception on the Celebrity Advertising Effect

When election expectations fail: Polarized perceptions of election legitimacy increase with accumulating evidence of election outcomes and with polarized media

Party v. The People: Testing corrective action and supportive engagement in a partisan political context

When Social Media Become Hostile Media: An Experimental Examination of News Sharing, Partisanship, and Follower Count