Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3><p>Accurate individual exposure assessment is crucial for evaluating the health effects of particulate matter (PM). Various portable monitors built upon low-cost optical sensors have emerged. However, the main challenge for their application is to guarantee accuracy of measurements.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Objective</h3><p>To assess the performance of a newly developed PM sensor, and to develop methods for post-hoc data calibration to optimize its data quality.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Method</h3><p>We conducted a series of laboratory experiments and field evaluations to quantify the reproducibility within Plantower PM sensors 7003 (PMS 7003) and the consistency between sensors and two established PM<sub>2.5</sub> measurement methods [tapered element oscillating microbalances (TEOM) and gravimetric method (GM)]. Post-hoc data calibration methods for sensors were based on a multiple linear regression model (MLRM) and a random forest model (RFM). Ratios of raw and calibrated readings over the data of reference methods were calculated to examine the improvement after calibration.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>Strong correlations (≥0.82) and relatively small relative standard deviations (16–21%) between sensors were found during the laboratory and the field sampling. Compared with the reference methods, moderate to strong coefficients of determination (0.56–0.83) were observed; however, significant deviations were presented. After calibration, the ratios of PMS measurements over that of two reference methods both became convergent.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p>Our study validated low-cost optical PM sensors under a wide range of PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations (8–167 μg/m<sup>3</sup>). Our findings indicated potential applicability of PM sensors in PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure assessment, and confirmed a need of calibration. Linear calibration methods may be sufficient for ambient monitoring using TEOM as a reference, while nonlinear calibration methods may be more appropriate for indoor monitoring using GM as a reference.</p>

Low Cost Pyranometer for Broad Range and Its Credibility Check with Standard Pyranometer

Aging Characteristic of Solar Coating and Their Cost-Effectiveness

Design, implementation, and testing of a system for calibrating solar energy measuring devices

Miniature pyranometer with asteroid shape thermopile.

A New Particle Sensor Based on True RMS Value Measurement.

Spectral Stray Light Effect on High-Temperature Measurements Using A Near-Infrared Multi-Wavelength Pyrometer

Assessing the Value of Complex Refractive Index and Particle Density for Calibration of Low-Cost Particle Matter Sensor for Size-Resolved Particle Count and PM2.5 Measurements

Measuring DNI with a New Radiometer Based on an Optical Fiber and Photodiode

Optimization of sensor model for solar radiation measurement with a pyranometer

Measurement Performance of an Optical CCD-based Pyrometer System

Study On The Performance Promotion Of The Surface Plasmon Resonance Analytical System

Reliable Measurement of Perovskite Solar Cells

On-field test and data calibration of a low-cost sensor for fine particles exposure assessment

Low-Cost Pyrometry System With Nonlinear Multisense Partial Least Squares.

Study on Effective Wavelength Calibration Method of Multispectral Pyrometer

Absolute Spectral Radiance Responsivity Calibration Of Sun Photometers

Development of a Pyrometer That Measures the True Temperature Field of the Two-Dimensional Array

Optomechanical Design and Application of Solar-Skylight Spectroradiometer

Radiation temperature measurement method for semitransparent materials using one-channel infrared pyrometer.

Evaluation of the Applicability of Solar and Lamp Radiometric Calibrations of a Precision Sun Photometer Operating Between 300 and 1025 nm

Study of Blackbody Cavity Photoelectric Pyrometer