Abstract:This paper develops a series of two-echelon closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) game models in which the retailer acts as the Stackelberg leader of the channel power under the scenarios of information symmetry and information asymmetry. The manufacturer has fairness concern and undertakes corporate social responsibility (CSR) by recycling used products using the reverse channel. We aim to explore the impact of fairness concerns and information asymmetry on the performance of the CLSC. Under the information symmetry, we compare different models with fairness concerns and find that one participant’s unilateral fairness concern can be beneficial to her or his own interests but not to the other participant’s interests. That is, each participant is motivated to adopt his (her) own unilateral fairness concern while avoiding fairness concern of the other. The manufacturer’s CSR level is always negatively related to her fairness concern information. However, the fairness concern has mixed effects on unit wholesale price and retail price in the different models. Bilateral fairness concerns can lead the retailer to raise the retail price, but not always raise the manufacturer’s wholesale price. Under information asymmetry, we investigate the impact of asymmetric information on the performance of the CLSC and find that asymmetric information is not always beneficial to the manufacturer although she owns private information on fairness concern. In each scenario, when both participants are concerned with fairness, we find that under certain conditions the manufacturer’s CSR level is always positively related to the colleting rate, but her utility does not always increase with it. Finally, we evaluate the information value of fairness concerns to the channel participants and find that the information value is always positive for the retailer but may be negative for the manufacturer when the level of fairness concern is higher than a certain threshold.

The Horizontal Fairness Concern of Backup Supplier in a Triadic Supply Chain

Risk Mitigation Benefit from Backup Suppliers in the Presence of the Horizontal Fairness Concern.

An Experimental Study of Fairness and Learning in a Triadic Supply Chain

Interactive Impact of Fairness Concerns and Competition on Supply Chain Coordination

A pricing/ordering model for a dyadic supply chain with buyback guarantee financing and fairness concerns

Complex Dynamics in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Risk Aversion and Fairness Concerns Under Supply Disruption

Research on Supply Chain Decision-making Considering Fairness Concerns and Green Technology Innovation

A dual-channel secondary closed-loop supply chain considering retail groups and fairness concerns

Guarantor Financing in a Four-Party Supply Chain Game with Leadership Influence

Dual‐channel supply chain coordination under risk aversion and fairness concerns

Rawlsian Fairness in Push and Pull Supply Chains

Supply chain coordination considering fairness concerns

The Complexity Analysis in Dual-Channel Supply Chain Based on Fairness Concern and Different Business Objectives

Quality and Pricing Decisions in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain with Nash Bargaining Fairness Concerns

Supply chain quality and pricing decisions with retailer fairness concerns and consumer dynamic reference quality effects

Optimal decisions in a closed-loop supply chain: fairness concerns, corporate social responsibility and information value

Low-Carbon supply chain optimisation with carbon emission reduction level and warranty period: nash bargaining fairness concern

Capacity Allocation and Compensation in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain under Uncertain Environment

Outsourcing Contracts and Ordering Decisions of a Supply Chain under Multi-Dimensional Uncertainties

Strategic cooperation with a backup supplier for the mitigation of supply disruptions

Fairness’s effect on the pricing decisions in a supply chain