Abstract:Enhancing supply chain resilience is fundamental to the stable development of manufacturing enterprises. By comparing three resilience strategies (investment in fixed supplier for stable supply, dual sourcing by adding backup suppliers, and hybrid strategy), we investigate their effects on improving supply chain resilience under supply disruption and selecting resilience strategies for manufacturing enterprises in a complex supply chain environment. We then propose a corresponding management approach for manufacturers. This study reveals the following: (1) Compared with the non-resilience strategy, the investment strategy for supply stability and hybrid strategy may adversely impact the manufacturer's profits while concurrently enhancing expected sales when the manufacturer's investment cost is high, whereas the dual sourcing strategy is an effective strategy to increase the manufacturer's expected profit. (2) Compared with investment and dual sourcing strategies, the hybrid strategy has a lower wholesale price but not always a lower sale price. (3) Manufacturers who prefer supply stability always adopt a hybrid strategy to ensure maximum expected sales volume; manufacturers who prefer profit adopt a hybrid strategy only when the investment cost is within a certain range; otherwise, they adopt a dual sourcing strategy to obtain higher profits. (4) Under an asymmetric sourcing strategy, when suppliers' costs of production differ significantly, manufacturers adopting dual sourcing and hybrid strategies do not always increase sales, and adopting an investment strategy for supply stability is a more sales-resilient strategy. (5) The results of manufacturer resilience strategy selection under a multi-product supply chain are similar to those for a single product.

Strategic cooperation with a backup supplier for the mitigation of supply disruptions

Using Backup Supply with Responsive Pricing to Mitigate Disruption Risk for a Risk-Averse Firm.

Risk Mitigation Benefit from Backup Suppliers in the Presence of the Horizontal Fairness Concern.

On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks

Impact of Supply Risks on Procurement Decisions

A Joint Strategy Based on Ordering and Insurance for Mitigating the Effects of Supply Chain Disruption on Risk-Averse Firms

Inducing Supplier Backup via Manufacturer Information Sharing under Supply Disruption Risk

The value of backup supply for mitigating disruption risk with equity finance

Mitigation strategies against supply disruption risk: a case study at the Ford Motor Company

Contingent or stable dual sourcing? The preferences of manufacturers and suppliers under supply disruption and competition

Coordinating a supply chain with backup supplier through buyback contract under supply disruption and uncertain demand

Dynamic compensation and contingent sourcing strategies for supply disruption

Dynamic sourcing strategies for supply disruptions under consumer stockpiling

System Dynamics Modeling-based Study of Contingent Sourcing under Supply Disruptions

Optimal resilience strategy for manufacturers to deal with supply disruptions: Investment in supply stability versus dual sourcing

Production Planning and Backup Sourcing Strategy of a Buyer-Dominant Supply Chain with Random Yield and Demand

Effect of Disruption Risk on a Supply Chain with Price-Dependent Demand

Supplier selection under disruption risk with hybrid procurement

Managing Supply Chain Disruption Threat Via a Strategy Combining Pricing and Self-Protection

Emergency supplies prepositioning via a government-led supply chain with a loss-averse supplier with anchoring

Dual-Source Procurement and Supplier Pricing Decision under Supply Interruption