Abstract:Third-party punishment is a common mechanism to promote cooperation in humans. Theoretical models of evolution of cooperation predict that punishment maintains cooperation if it is sufficiently frequent. On the other hand, empirical studies have found that participants frequently punishing others do not success in comparison with those not eager to punish others, suggesting that punishment is suboptimal and thus should not be frequent. That being the case, our question is what mechanism, if any, can sustain cooperation even if punishment is rare. The present study proposes that one possible mechanism is risk-averse social learning. Using the method of evolutionary game dynamics, we investigate the effect of risk attitude of individuals on the question. In our framework, individuals select a strategy based on its risk, i.e., the variance of the payoff, as well as its expected payoff; risk-averse individuals prefer to select a strategy with low variable payoff. Using the framework, we examine the evolution of cooperation in two-player social dilemma games with punishment. We study two models: cooperators and defectors compete, while defectors may be punished by an exogenous authority; and cooperators, defectors, and cooperative punishers compete, while defectors may be punished by the cooperative punishers. We find that in both models, risk-averse individuals achieve stable cooperation with significantly low frequency of punishment. We also examine three punishment variants: in each game, all defectors are punished; only one of defectors is punished; and only a defector who exploits a cooperator or a cooperative punisher is punished. We find that the first and second variants effectively promote cooperation. Comparing the first and second variants, each can be more effective than the other depending on punishment frequency.

Punishment as a mechanism to maintain bilateral cooperation: A social behavior experiment

Costly Punishment Does Not Always Increase Cooperation

Human Punishment Behavior

Conditional Punishment Resolves Social Dilemma in Spatial Network

Combining Reputation And Punishment To Promote Cooperation

Self-serving reward and punishment: evidence from the laboratory

Conditional Punishment: Descriptive Social Norms Drive Negative Reciprocity

Inter-brain Synchronization is Weakened by the Introduction of External Punishment

Punishment Diminishes the Benefits of Network Reciprocity in Social Dilemma Experiments.

Institutional Preferences, Social Preferences and Cooperation: Evidence from a Lab-in-the-field Experiment in Rural China

Evolution of Cooperation under Punishment.

On Punishment Mechanism in the Cooperative Behaviors of Peasants

If Cooperation is Likely Punish Mildly: Insights from Economic Experiments Based on the Snowdrift Game.

[A test of the strong reciprocity model: relationship between cooperation and punishment].

Cooperation dynamics in spatial public goods games with graded punishment mechanism

Rare Third-Party Punishment Promotes Cooperation in Risk-Averse Social Learning Dynamics

Low-cost, high-impact altruistic punishment promotes cooperation cascades in human social networks

Punishment mechanisms and cooperation in public goods games: Experimental evidence

Promote or hinder? The role of punishment in the emergence of cooperation

Research on Differences of Punishment and Reward: Evidence from Public Goods Experiments in the Stranger Condition

Punishment in the Form of Shared Cost Promotes Altruism in the Cooperative Dilemma Games.