Abstract:Objective:To provide references for promoting the anti-G ability of flying cadets and improving the training methods by testing the flying cadets′ relaxed +G z tolerance and analyzing the related factors. Methods:Fifty-seven healthy male flying cadets were tested for anti-G ability by cluster sampling. The indicators included relaxed +G z tolerance, maximal pedal force of lower limbs, maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) and maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP). The subjects were divided into high and low tolerance groups, and the low tolerance group was divide into 2 groups by judging if they were with or without visual change. The subjects were divided into high and low limbs strength groups by measured maximal pedal force. The questionnaire was used to get the information of human centrifuge test and the physical training of flying cadets at ordinary time. According to the results of the questionnaires, the subjects were divided into low strength (≤3 times/week) and high strength (>3 times/week) physical training groups by aerobic training intensity. Results:Relaxed +G z tolerance test results of the flying cadets were 3.5 G and 4.0 G, with an average of (3.56±0.17) G. Maximal pedal force of lower limbs was averagely (449.3±105.6) kgf (1 kgf=9.806 N). MEP was averagely (20.1±3.5) kPa. MIP was averagely (10.5±2.3) kPa. MEP of 4.0 G group was higher than that of 3.5 G group, and the difference was significant ( t=2.08, P=0.043). In the subjects of 3.5 G relaxed +G z tolerance, MEP of unchanged vision group was higher than that of changed vision group, and the difference was significant ( t=2.35, P=0.023). Relaxed +G z tolerance of high pedal force group (≥449.3 kgf) was higher than that of low pedal force group (<449.3 kgf), and the difference was significant ( t=2.20, P=0.035). 66.7% of the subjects did not learn correct anti-G maneuver; 91.2% of the subjects took long-distance running; 82.5% of the subjects took strength training; 57.9% of the subjects did lower limbs strength training, but 45.6% of them did not understand the correct methods of training muscle groups. MEP of the high training group was higher than that of low training group, and the difference was significant ( t=3.25, P=0.002). Maximal pedal force of lower limbs in the high training group was lower than that in the low training group, and the difference was significant ( t=2.35, P=0.022). Conclusions:The flying cadets′ anti-G ability is not good in centrifuge. They should be arranged to experience and trained in human centrifuge as early as possible. Anti-G physical training should be enhanced based on anaerobic exercise.

[Two High Performance Fighter Pilots with Low +gz Tolerance Rectified by Centrifuge Training].

A centrifuge simulated push–pull manoeuvre with subsequent reduced +Gz tolerance

Application of new human centrifuge in military aviation medicine

[Integrated Protection Capability Afforded by a New Type Capstan Anti-G Equipment and Anti-G Straining Maneuver].

Mathematical Modeling Of High G Protection Afforded By Various Anti-G Equipment And Techniques

Centrifuge Evaluation of the +g_z Protection of the New Anti-G Straining Maneuver: HP and PHP Maneuver

Analysis and discussions on the status of pilots' centrifuge training

Examination of flying cadets′ relaxed +G z tolerance and analysis of related factors

Assessing and training a pilot experienced push-pull manenver induced air G-induced loss of consciousness in human centrifuge and literature review

Study on applying gradual-onset rate mode in acceleration tolerance determination

Centrifuge assessment of the +Gz protection afforded by pressure breathing for +Gz (PBG) with different pressure schedules

Approach of HP and PHP Maneuver Training on Human Centrifuge

Roles of Physiological Responses and Anthropometric Factors on the Gravitational Force Tolerance for Occupational Hypergravity Exposure

Analysis of the Relaxed +gz Tolerance Records of 580 Fighter Pilots

Effects of Anti-G Physical Training on +gz Tolerance in Plateau

[+Gz Protection of the on Board Oxygen Generating System (OBOGS) and Anti-G Equipment].

+GZ Protection of the Newly Developed Bladder Anti-G Equipment

Effect of Special Anti-G Physical Training Program on +gz Protection of HP Maneuver

Centrifuge Evaluation of +g_z Protection of the Newly Developed Anti-G System

Centrifuge Evaluation of a New Integrated Crew Protection System

Approach of Push-Pull Effect Protection Training on Centrifuge by Performing HP Maneuver