Centrifuge assessment of the +Gz protection afforded by pressure breathing for +Gz (PBG) with different pressure schedules

Xichen Geng,Changlu Zhan,Guiding Yan,Xu Chu,Xia Lü,WuXing Zhang
2000-01-01
Abstract:Pressure breathing for +Gz (PBG) systems has been incorporated into service in the high performance fighter aircraft, but there have been significant differences among PBG pressure schedules in different countries. Therefore, the optimal PBG pressure schedule remains to be defined. The purpose of this study was to define an optimal pressure schedule for a PBG system. Five male subjects, wearing the GZ-2 anti-G suit and medium-sized bladder vest, performed PBG with 12, 18, and 24 mmHg/G pressure schedules during rapid onset rate (3.0 G/s) centrifuge +Gz exposures. The +Gz protection of PBG with each of the three pressure schedules was measured and subjective ratings were collected. The +Gz tolerance of subjects wearing the GZ-2 anti-G suit while performing PBG, reached +8.10, +8.54, and +8.56 Gz with 12, 18, and 24 mmHg/G pressure schedules, respectively. The +Gz protection of PBG was 2.00, 2.54, and 2.44 G for the 12, 18, and 24 mmHg/G pressure schedules, respectively. Subjective ratings indicated that the PBG with the 18 mmHg/G pressure schedule was better than the others. Our data suggest that a PBG pressure schedule of 18 mmHg/G in a PBG system is optimal. The system with this PBG pressure schedule not only can assure the anti-G performance of PBG, but also results in fewer side effects.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?