Abstract:AbstractEfficient host–guest complexation and interesting self‐assembled structures formed between two crown ether‐based cryptands and a 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridinium)ethane derivative 3 are reported. By self‐assembly of cis‐dibenzo‐24‐crown‐8‐based cryptand 1 and guest 3, a [3]pseudorotaxane was formed in solution, which further formed a supramolecular poly[3]pseudorotaxane structure in the solid state driven by π‐π stacking interactions. Meanwhile, a [2]pseudorotaxane, obtained from self‐assembly of a bis(m‐phenylene)‐32‐crown‐10‐based cryptand 2 and guest 3, can form a supramolecular poly[2]pseudorotaxane structure in the solid state. This difference in the binding model reflects the diversity of host–guest chemistry of crown ether‐based cryptands. Furthermore, these host–guest recognition processes and self‐assembled structures were fully characterized by 1H NMR, UV/Vis spectroscopy, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, and single‐crystal X‐ray analysis. Interestingly, formation of the [3]pseudorotaxane between cryptand 1 and guest 3 can be reversibly controlled by adding and removing potassium cations in acetone. This reversible complexation process provides a simple on/off mechanism that can be used in the construction of controllable molecular switches.

Pseudocryptand-Type [2]pseudorotaxanes Based on Bis(meta-phenylene)-32-Crown-10 Derivatives and Paraquats with Remarkably Improved Association Constants

An acid-base adjustable pseudocryptand-type [2]pseudorotaxane based on a bis(meta-phenylene)-32-crown-10 derivative and paraquat

Pseudocryptand-Type [3]pseudorotaxane and “Hook-Ring” Polypseudo[2]catenane Based on a Bis(m-phenylene)-32-crown-10 Derivative and Bisparaquat Derivatives

First Pseudorotaxane-Like [3]complexes Based on Cryptands and Paraquat: Self-Assembly and Crystal Structures

[2]Pseudorotaxanes based on the cryptand/monopyridinium recognition motif

The First [2]pseudorotaxane and the First Pseudocryptand-Type Poly[2]pseudorotaxane Based on Bis(meta-Phenylene)-32-crown-10 and Paraquat Derivatives.

Contrasting biscryptand/dimethyl paraquat [3]pseudorotaxanes: statistical vs. anticooperative complexation behavior.

Pseudocryptand-type Complexes of Heterocyclic Derivatives of Bis(meta-Phenylene)-32-crown-10 with Diquat

Remarkably Improved Complexation of a Bisparaquat by Formation of a Pseudocryptand-Based [3]Pseudorotaxane.

Pseudocryptand Hosts for Paraquats and Diquats.

A new cryptand/paraquat [2]pseudorotaxane

A New Functional Bis(m-phenylene)-32-crown-10-Based Cryptand Host for Paraquats

[N]pseudorotaxanes (n = 2, 3) from Self‐Assembly of Two Cryptands and a 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridinium)ethane Derivative

Pseudorotaxanes from Self-Assembly of Two Crown Ether-Based Cryptands and A 1,2-Bis(pyridinium) Ethane Derivative

Efficient Syntheses of Bis(m-Phenylene)-26-crown-8-based Cryptand/paraquat Derivative [2]rotaxanes by Immediate Solvent Evaporation Method

A cryptand/bisparaquat [3]pseudorotaxane by cooperative complexation.

[3]Pseudorotaxanes Based on the Cryptand/Monopyridinium Salt Recognition Motif

Supramolecular Side-Chain Poly[2]Pseudorotaxanes Formed by Orthogonal Coordination-Driven Self-Assembly and Crown-Ether-Based Host Guest Interactions

A Supramolecular Poly[3]pseudorotaxane by Self-Assembly of a Homoditopic Cylindrical Bis(crown Ether) Host and a Bisparaquat Derivative

Two protocols for the preparation of [2]rotaxanes based on the dibenzo-24-crown-8-based cryptand/paraquat recognition motif

[N]pseudorotaxanes Constructed by a Bis(p-Phenylene)-34-crown-10-based Cryptand: Different Binding Behaviors Induced by Minor Structural Changes of Guests