COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF PCMs AND INSULATION MATERIALS ON ENERGY SAVING IN BUILDINGS LOCATED IN FIVE TYPICAL CITIES

Lifeng Ding,Hong Ye

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19912/j.0254-0096.2011.04.014

2011-01-01

Abstract:Five cities which represent five distinct climate zones in China were choose, and the passive and active performances of PCMs or EPS in buildings were discussed in terms of hours falling in the range of comfort and associated energy-consumption per unit area of construction, respectively. In the analysis, some economic factors were also considered, including peak-load shifting, investments and operating costs of heating and air-conditioning systems. The results indicate that the insulation on the outside surface of external wall is most significant in terms of energy savings, and the amount of saved energy is proportional to the ratio of heating energy to the total energy consumed in buildings; PCMs inner walls can make room comfortable and the air-conditioning consume less energy in summer, however, it needs a long period for payback of investment, that is 15 years at least in the Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou because of the high investment; For cold zones where only heating is needed, the floor heating system can give a relatively satisfactory result in energy saving when using PCM as thermal mass, and the payback period falls within 5 years. It's more cost-effective to use external insulation materials than PCMs, the payback period of the former is only one and a half year.