Abstract:The separation of a natural gas mixture containing 85 mol% CH4 and 15 mol% N2 by dual reflux pressure swing adsorption (DR PSA) was investigated using dynamic non-isothermal numerical simulations previously benchmarked against experiments. Two different adsorbents were employed: a commercially available activated carbon (AC1) and the recently developed ionic liquidic zeolite (ILZ), which has about twice the selectivity for methane over nitrogen than the activated carbon. Four DR PSA cycle configurations (PL-A, PH-A, PL-B and PH-B) were studied and iteratively optimized in terms of separation performance and energy consumption. The dynamic non-isothermal simulations, implemented in the software platform Aspen Adsorption, included a polytropic compressor model with temperature dependent heat capacities for more realistic predictions of the compressor duty. The heavy product to feed ratio, the feed step time and the light reflux ratio were selected as key optimization parameters for all four cycles at fixed bed pressure ratio, feed location and feed flow rate. The simulations showed that A-cycles were superior to B-cycles in terms of their separation performance for both adsorbent materials. Overall, the separation performance achieved by AC1 was lower than that by ILZ. At optimized conditions for AC1, PL-A and PH-A cycles achieved approximately 92 mol% CH4 in the heavy product and 4.5 mol% CH4 in the light product with corresponding energy requirement at 9.9 kJ mol−1 (feed) and 8.7 kJ mol−1 (feed), while using the ILZ adsorbent, both PL-A and PH-A cycles were able to deliver 0.9 mol% CH4 in the light product and 93.5 mol% CH4 in the heavy product. The cycle work of the PL-A and PH-A configuration using ILZ was 8.8 and 7.7 kJ mol−1 (feed), respectively. These simulation results show that DR PSA processes using ionic liquidic zeolites can meet strict natural gas separation requirements and that such processes can efficiently upgrade sub-quality natural gas.

PSA separation of CH 4/N 2 mixture with carbon molecular sieve

Modelling and Simulation of Two-Bed PSA Process for Separating H2 from Methane Steam Reforming

Separation of Ethane/ethylene Gas Mixture by Ethane-Selective CAU-3-NDCA Adsorbent

Separation of $CH_4/CO_2/N_2$ Mixture by Pressure Swing Adsorption

Separation of Methane and Nitrogen Using Heavy Reflux Pressure Swing Adsorption: Experiments and Modeling

An improved vacuum pressure swing adsorption process with the simulated moving bed operation mode for CH4/N2 separation to produce high-purity methane

Separation of Methane–Nitrogen Mixture by Pressure Swing Adsorption for Natural Gas Upgrading

A New Composite Sorbent for Methane-Nitrogen Separation by Adsorption

Separation of methane and nitrogen using ionic liquidic zeolites by pressure vacuum swing adsorption

Novel zeolite/carbon monolith adsorbents for efficient CH4/N2 separation

Gas-Phase Simulated Moving Bed for Methane/Nitrogen Separation Using a Commercial Activated Carbon

Nitrogen rejection from natural gas by dual reflux-pressure swing adsorption using activated carbon and ionic liquidic zeolite

Enrichment of Oxygen-Containing Low-Concentration Coalbed Methane with CMS-3KT as the Adsorbent

Methane/nitrogen separation through pressure swing adsorption process from nitrogen-rich streams

High-pressure separation performance of Ni(TMBDC)(DABCO)0.5 featured low-polarity channel for CH4/N2 mixture

MIL-101-Cr/Fe/Fe-NH2 for Efficient Separation of CH4 and C3H8 from Simulated Natural Gas

Carbon nanofibers with gas selective layer containing rich and accessible ultramicropores for methane/nitrogen separation

Elucidating the Separation Role of C3N Slit-pore on N2/CH4 in Coalbed Methane

Thermodynamic–Kinetic Synergistic Separation for O 2 /N 2 and CO 2 /CH 4 on Nanoporous Carbon Molecular Sieves

Experimental investigation of CO2 separation by adsorption methods in natural gas purification

Microstructure effect of carbon materials on the low-concentration methane adsorption separation from its mixture with nitrogen