Abstract:Background The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) has become one of the most widely used measurement tools in child and adolescent mental health work across the globe. The SDQ was originally developed and validated within the UK and whilst its reliability and validity have been replicated in several countries important cross cultural issues have been raised. We describe normative data, reliability and validity of the Chinese translation of the SDQ (parent, teacher and self report versions) in a large group of children from Shanghai. Methods The SDQ was administered to the parents and teachers of students from 12 of Shanghai's 19 districts, aged between 3 and 17 years old, and to those young people aged between 11 and 17 years. Retest data was collected from parents and teachers for 45 students six weeks later. Data was analysed to describe normative scores, bandings and cut-offs for normal, borderline and abnormal scores. Reliability was assessed from analyses of internal consistency, inter-rater agreement, and temporal stability. Structural validity, convergent and discriminant validity were assessed. Results Full parent and teacher data was available for 1965 subjects and self report data for 690 subjects. Normative data for this Chinese urban population with bandings and cut-offs for borderline and abnormal scores are described. Principle components analysis indicates partial agreement with the original five factored subscale structure however this appears to hold more strongly for the Prosocial Behaviour, Hyperactivity – Inattention and Emotional Symptoms subscales than for Conduct Problems and Peer Problems. Internal consistency as measured by Cronbach's α coefficient were generally low ranging between 0.30 and 0.83 with only parent and teacher Hyperactivity – Inattention and teacher Prosocial Behaviour subscales having α > 0.7. Inter-rater correlations were similar to those reported previously (range 0.23 – 0.49) whilst test retest reliability was generally lower than would be expected (range 0.40 – 0.79). Convergent and discriminant validity are supported. Conclusion We report mixed findings with respect the psychometric properties of the Chinese translation of the SDQ. Reliability is a particular concern particularly for Peer Problems and self ratings by adolescents. There is good support for convergent validity but only partial support for structural validity. It may be possible to resolve some of these issues by carefully examining the wording and meaning of some of the current questions.

Reliability and validity of World Health Organization-disability attitudes scales in Chinese version

Translation, Revision and Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of World Health Organization Quality of Life-Disability Scales for physical disability

[Reliability and Validity of a Short-Form Health Survey Scale (SF-36), Chinese Version Used in an Elderly Population of Zhejiang Province in China].

Development of traditional Chinese version of World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 36--item (WHODAS 2.0) in Taiwan: validity and reliability analyses

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

Preliminary Validation Study of the WHO Quality of Life (WHOQOL) Scales for People with Spinal Cord Injury in Mainland China.

Reliability and Vaiidatioa of the Social Comparison Orientation Scale

The Chinese version of the world health organization quality of life instrument-older adults module (WHOQOL-OLD): psychometric evaluation

A study of reliability and validity of appraisal questionnaire (Chinese language version) of human immunodeficieney virus positive persons

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire for Discharged Patients with Spinal Cord Injury

Reliability and validity of Questionnaire on Health Status Assessment

The Chinese Version of Attitudes Towards Guidelines Scale: Validity and Reliability Assessment

Reliability and validity of Social-Adaptive Functioning Evaluation in China

Diabetes Attitude Scale: validation in type-2 diabetes patients in multiple centers in China.

Psychometric Testing of the Chinese Version of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey among People Living with HIV/AIDS in China.

The Validity, Reliability and Normative Scores of the Parent, Teacher and Self Report Versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in China.

Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure of the Chinese Version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in People Living with HIV.

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Weiss Functional Impairment Scale-Parent form for school age children

A Study on the Relationship among Disability Attitude, Mental Health and Subjective Wellbeing of Persons with Disabilities

[Validation of a Chinese Version of the Oral Health Impact Profile-14].