Abstract:BackgroundThe health and safety climate of workplace has an important impact on the physical and mental health of workers. There is no available scale for the evaluation of workplace health and safety climate in China at present.ObjectiveThis study aims to sinicize and evaluate the reliability and validity of the Health and Safety Climate Survey.MethodsThe English version of Health and Safety Climate Survey was translated to Chinese and back-translated to English, and followed by expert evaluation to develop a Chinese version. Quota sampling method was used to select 2600 employees from 16 enterprises and public institutions in Pudong New Area of Shanghai and to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the scale. Structural validity, convergent validity, and discriminant validity were included in validity evaluation. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to test structural validity. In EFA, an acceptable factor loading of items on their respective dimensions was > 0.60. In CFA, an acceptable root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), a standard absolute fitness index, was < 0.05. Comparative fit index (CFI) and parsimony-adjusted non-normed fit index (PNFI), measures of incremental improvement and fit, > 0.90 indicated a good fit. Convergent validity was evaluated by average variance extracted (AVE), and an AVE > 0.50 indicated good convergent validity. Discriminant validity was determined as good by the square root of AVE greater than the correlation coefficient between latent variables. Cronbach’s α coefficient was used to evaluate the internal consistency of the scale; the internal consistency considered was very good with an α > 0.90. Cronbach’s α coefficient may cause underestimation of reliability in the case of error correlation. Therefore, composite reliability (CR) calculated based on structural equation model >0.70 indicated that the CR was good.ResultsThe response rate was 95.69%. The Chinese version of Health and Safety Climate Survey included 22 items belonging to six dimensions which was extracted by the EFA, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 74.79%. The corrected RMSEA was 0.045, the PNFI was 0.970, and the CFI was 0.975 in the CFA, indicating good fit. The dimensional AVE values were all greater than 0.50, indicating good CV. The square root of AVE was greater than the correlation coefficient between latent variables, indicating good DV. The Cronbach’s α was 0.90 for the total scale and were above 0.70 for all dimensions. The CR was 0.93 for the total scale and were above 0.70 for all dimensions, indicating that the overall reliability of the scale was good.ConclusionThe Chinese version of Health and Safety Climate Survey has good reliability and validity, and can be further improved in field application.

Reliability and validity of Questionnaire on Health Status Assessment

[Reliability and Validity of a Short-Form Health Survey Scale (SF-36), Chinese Version Used in an Elderly Population of Zhejiang Province in China].

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of self-reporting questionnaire for the screening of mental disorder among community population

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Self-Reporting Questionnaire 20 (Srq-20) in Community Settings

A Research on Measuring Health Status for Residents in Rural Areas

Analysis on reliability and validity of SF-36 scale in urban residents]

Reliability and validity of Chinese version of the Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire (SNAQ) in community-dwelling old people

Validation of the EQ-5D in a general population sample in urban China

Reliability and validity of 12-item Short-Form health survey (SF-12) for the health status of Chinese community elderly population in Xujiahui district of Shanghai

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of a short form of the family health scale

Validation Study Of The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (Saq) In Public Hospitals Of Heilongjiang Province, China

Validation of COPD Population Screener Questionnaire in Chinese Population: A National Multicenter Study

Development and validation of a short-form suboptimal health status questionnaire

Reliability and Validity of Self-made Life Quality Questionnaire of Lung Cancer patients

Reliability and Validity of Health and Safety Climate Survey

The reliability and validity of Chinese version of SF36 v2 in aging patients with chronic heart failure

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Chronic Heart Failure Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire (CHFQOLQ-20)

Development and testing of the reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire

Development of National Norm for Multidimensional Sub-health Questionnaire of Adolescents (MSQA)

Validity and Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the 5-Item WHO Well-Being Index