A Bio-Inspired Small-Sized Wall-Climbing Caterpillar Robot
Houxiang Zhang,Wei Wang,Juan Gonzalez-Gomez,Jianwei Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/8918
2010-01-01
Abstract:Applications 2 the beginning of section 3, we investigate the climbing locomotion mechanism adopted by caterpillars.Based on this, our on-going climbing robotic project will be introduced.Different aspects including system design, mechanical implementation and control realization will be presented in detail.Although we designed two climbing caterpillar robotic configurations, the simpler inchworm configuration is the focus for discussion in this paper.After pointing out future work, our conclusions are given in the end. Related research in literature Climbing mechanism of caterpillarsClimbing robots are a kind of mobile robots.There are two important issues for designing a successful climbing robotic prototype.The first one is the adhesion principle, the second one is mechanical kinematics.Many climbing robots use legged structures with two (biped) to eight legs, where more limbs inherently provide redundant support during walking and can increase the load capacity and safety.The robots with multiple-leg kinematics are complex due to several degrees of freedom.This kind of robots which use vacuum suckers and grasping grippers for attachment to buildings are too big, too heavy and too complex.As the simplest kinematical model in this class, bipeds vary most significantly in the style of their middle joints.Robots by Nishi (Nishi, 1992) and the robot ROBIN (Pack, et al., 1997) use a revolute middle joint.A prismatic middle joint is used by ROSTAM IV (Bahr, et al., 1996), while the robot by Yano (Yano, et al., 1997) does not have a middle joint but simply a rigid central body.ROSTAM IV, the smallest robot in this class built to date, weighs approximately only 4 kg, but the reliability and safety of its movement is not satisfying.The robot ROMA (Abderrahim, et al., 1991) is a multifunctional, self-supporting climbing robot which can travel into a complex metallic-based environment and self-support its locomotion system for 3D movements.Generally, construction and control of these robots is relatively complicated.The other problem is that the climbing robots based on the grasping method often work in a specialized environment such as metal-based buildings.In order to realize a climbing movement, the mechanical structure of the robots is not designed modularly.Inspired by gecko bristles, the last few years have witnessed a strong interest in using molecular force as a new attachment method for climbing robots.Flexible climbing prototypes with multi-legs (Sitti, et al., 2003) and with wheels (Murphy, et al., 2006) have been emerging.From the locomotion viewpoint, there is no difference to the other climbing prototypes.The prototypes with a wheeled and chain-track vehicle are usually portable.The adhesion used by this kind of robot is negative pressure or propellers, therefore the robots can move continuously.A smart mobile robot was proposed as a flexible mobile climbing platform carrying a CCD camera and other sensors.It uses a negative pressure chamber to attach to vertical surfaces.Even if this kind suction is not sensitive to a leakage of air, the negative pressure is not good enough for safe and reliable attachment to a vertical surface when the robot crosses window frames.An improved smart structure with two linked-track vehicles was proposed, which can be reconfigured so that the robot can move between surfaces standing at an angle of 0 -90 degrees due to the pitching DOF actuated by the joint to www.intechopen.com