Abstract:Purpose To identify and validate contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features for differentiating malignant from benign splenic lesions. Patients and Methods Splenic lesions in 123 patients who underwent conventional ultrasound (B-mode US) and CEUS were included in this study. Two radiologists evaluated the sonograms of B-mode and CEUS. Statistical analysis was performed to identify significant imaging predictors for splenic malignant lesions. Two other radiologists independently reviewed B-mode and CEUS sonograms and diagnosed the lesions based on proposed criteria as 1) benign, 2) probably benign, 3) probably malignant or 4) malignant. The diagnostic efficiency between B-mode US and CEUS was compared. Results Common imaging findings of malignant lesions included hypoechoic, ill-defined margin, absence of cystic/necrotic portion, presence of splenomegaly on B-mode US, and hypoenhancement, rapid washout and presence of intralesional vessels on CEUS (P < 0.05). Among them, three independent features were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis: hypoechoic pattern, hypoenhancement pattern and intralesional vessels. When three of these findings were combined as a predictor for splenic malignant lesions, 22 (55.0%) of 40 malignant splenic lesions were identified with a specificity of 100%. The diagnostic performance of two readers using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was 0.622 and 0.533, respectively, for B-mode US, which was significantly improved to 0.908 and 0.906 for CEUS (P < 0.001). The degree of other diagnostic efficiency and inter-reader agreement also increased with CEUS compared to B-mode US. Conclusion CEUS may provide more useful information than B-mode US and improve the diagnosis efficiency for distinguishing malignant from benign splenic lesions.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in spleen preliminary study

The Role of Real-time Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Focal Splenic Lesions

Real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosing of focal spleen lesions.

Evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis of focal splenic solid lesions

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of the liver: a review of the clinical evidence for SonoVue and Sonazoid

Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Differential Diagnosis of Focal Splenic Lesions

Comparison of enhancement features of splenic solid tumors on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and ;contrast-enhanced CT

Conventional Ultrasound and Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Splenic Diseases

Conventional Ultrasound and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Splenic Diseases A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging Features of Focal Splenic Tuberculosis

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonic Evaluation of Mild Splenic Trauma

Ultrasound diagnosis of splenic hemangiolyphangioma

Real-time Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Focal Splenic Lesions

Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of renal diseases

Study of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosis of abdominal lesions

Value of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Focal Hepatic Lesions

Application Value of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Biliary Diseases

Diagnostic Value of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound for Splenic Artery Complications Following Acute Pancreatitis

The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of focal liver lesion in the transplanted liver

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in delayed splenic vascular injury and active extravasation diagnosis

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant focal liver lesions in 54 cases