Abstract:Purpose To identify and validate contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features for differentiating malignant from benign splenic lesions. Patients and Methods Splenic lesions in 123 patients who underwent conventional ultrasound (B-mode US) and CEUS were included in this study. Two radiologists evaluated the sonograms of B-mode and CEUS. Statistical analysis was performed to identify significant imaging predictors for splenic malignant lesions. Two other radiologists independently reviewed B-mode and CEUS sonograms and diagnosed the lesions based on proposed criteria as 1) benign, 2) probably benign, 3) probably malignant or 4) malignant. The diagnostic efficiency between B-mode US and CEUS was compared. Results Common imaging findings of malignant lesions included hypoechoic, ill-defined margin, absence of cystic/necrotic portion, presence of splenomegaly on B-mode US, and hypoenhancement, rapid washout and presence of intralesional vessels on CEUS (P < 0.05). Among them, three independent features were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis: hypoechoic pattern, hypoenhancement pattern and intralesional vessels. When three of these findings were combined as a predictor for splenic malignant lesions, 22 (55.0%) of 40 malignant splenic lesions were identified with a specificity of 100%. The diagnostic performance of two readers using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was 0.622 and 0.533, respectively, for B-mode US, which was significantly improved to 0.908 and 0.906 for CEUS (P < 0.001). The degree of other diagnostic efficiency and inter-reader agreement also increased with CEUS compared to B-mode US. Conclusion CEUS may provide more useful information than B-mode US and improve the diagnosis efficiency for distinguishing malignant from benign splenic lesions.

Real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosing of focal spleen lesions.

The Role of Real-time Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Focal Splenic Lesions

Real-time Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Focal Splenic Lesions

Evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis of focal splenic solid lesions

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging Features of Focal Splenic Tuberculosis

Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Differential Diagnosis of Focal Splenic Lesions

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in spleen preliminary study

Comparison of enhancement features of splenic solid tumors on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and ;contrast-enhanced CT

Contrast-enhanced Sonography in Differential Diagnosis of Focal Hypoechoic Lesions in Fatty Liver

[Value of Real-Time Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Renal Solid Renal Lesions].

Characterization of Small Focal Liver Lesions Using Real‐time Contrast‐Enhanced Sonography

Characterization Of Small Focal Liver Lesions Using Real-Time Contrast-Enhanced Sonography - Diagnostic Performance Analysis In 200 Patients

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in focal liver lesions: summarization of a series experience with 1015 cases referred to European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) guidelines

Characterization of Focal Liver Lesions Using an Innovative Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Technique

Conventional Ultrasound and Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Splenic Diseases

Clinical Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in the Characterization of Focal Liver Lesions: a Prospective Multicenter Trial.

The Role of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Small Focal Liver Lesions

Characterization of Focal Liver Lesions Indistinctive on B Mode Ultrasound: Benefits of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

Real-time Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Focal Liver Lesions in Fatty Liver

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant focal liver lesions in 54 cases

1126: the Application of Real-time Gray Scale Contrast Ultrasonography in Diagnosis of Focal Liver Lesions