1402: Clinical Study of Solid Pancreatic Focal Lesion with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
Xiaoyan Xie,Luyao Zhou,Huixiong Xu,Zuofeng Xu,Xiaohua Xie,Mingde Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.06.788
IF: 3.694
2009-01-01
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
Abstract:ObjectiveTo investigate the value of enhancement patterns of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of solid focal lesions of pancreas (s-FLPs).MethodsBy analyze the characterizations in different phases of 89 solid focal lesions of pancreas with final diagnosis which were examined with ultrasound contrast agent SonoVue combined with low mechanical index contrast-enhanced ultrasound technique retrospectively, we investigate the value of differential diagnosis in contrast-enhanced ultrasound.ResultsThere were no statistically significant difference in the surrounding pancreas parenchyma enhancement time, the lesion enhancement time and the peak enhancement time between different group of solid focal lesions(P>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in beginning to peak enhancement time between pancreatic carcinoma group and no pancreatic carcinoma group (P=0.006). Be used the enhancement model as a diagnosis index to differentiate pancreatic carcinoma and tumor –like panceatitis, the sensitivity, sensitivity,accuracy were 89.7%, 95.2%, 91.1%;81.3%, 100%, 96.6% respectively. Combination of variant index showed enhancement model and enhancement speed had best diagnosis result, but no change in Youden index.ConclusionDifferent solid focal lesions of pancreas show different enhancements display in contrast-enhanced ultrasound. But the enhancement model and enhancement speed were the most useful diagnosis index. ObjectiveTo investigate the value of enhancement patterns of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of solid focal lesions of pancreas (s-FLPs). To investigate the value of enhancement patterns of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of solid focal lesions of pancreas (s-FLPs). MethodsBy analyze the characterizations in different phases of 89 solid focal lesions of pancreas with final diagnosis which were examined with ultrasound contrast agent SonoVue combined with low mechanical index contrast-enhanced ultrasound technique retrospectively, we investigate the value of differential diagnosis in contrast-enhanced ultrasound. By analyze the characterizations in different phases of 89 solid focal lesions of pancreas with final diagnosis which were examined with ultrasound contrast agent SonoVue combined with low mechanical index contrast-enhanced ultrasound technique retrospectively, we investigate the value of differential diagnosis in contrast-enhanced ultrasound. ResultsThere were no statistically significant difference in the surrounding pancreas parenchyma enhancement time, the lesion enhancement time and the peak enhancement time between different group of solid focal lesions(P>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in beginning to peak enhancement time between pancreatic carcinoma group and no pancreatic carcinoma group (P=0.006). Be used the enhancement model as a diagnosis index to differentiate pancreatic carcinoma and tumor –like panceatitis, the sensitivity, sensitivity,accuracy were 89.7%, 95.2%, 91.1%;81.3%, 100%, 96.6% respectively. Combination of variant index showed enhancement model and enhancement speed had best diagnosis result, but no change in Youden index. There were no statistically significant difference in the surrounding pancreas parenchyma enhancement time, the lesion enhancement time and the peak enhancement time between different group of solid focal lesions(P>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in beginning to peak enhancement time between pancreatic carcinoma group and no pancreatic carcinoma group (P=0.006). Be used the enhancement model as a diagnosis index to differentiate pancreatic carcinoma and tumor –like panceatitis, the sensitivity, sensitivity,accuracy were 89.7%, 95.2%, 91.1%;81.3%, 100%, 96.6% respectively. Combination of variant index showed enhancement model and enhancement speed had best diagnosis result, but no change in Youden index. ConclusionDifferent solid focal lesions of pancreas show different enhancements display in contrast-enhanced ultrasound. But the enhancement model and enhancement speed were the most useful diagnosis index. Different solid focal lesions of pancreas show different enhancements display in contrast-enhanced ultrasound. But the enhancement model and enhancement speed were the most useful diagnosis index.