Conventional Ultrasound and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Splenic Diseases A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Xing-Zhao Li,Jun Song,Zhi-Xia Sun,Yan-Yan Yang,Yuan-Qiang Lin,Hui Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15291
2020-01-01
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Abstract:Accurate diagnosis of splenic diseases is important for timely and accurate treatment. The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and conventional ultrasound (US) in detecting splenic lesions. A systematic literature search was undertaken, and 8 studies met the inclusion criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of the consolidated results of CEUS were 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92-0.97) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.90-0.99), respectively (I-2 = 27.4%; area under the curve [AUC] from a summary receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.97). The sensitivity and specificity of the consolidated results of conventional US were 0.70 (95% CI, 0.56-0.80) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.76-0.99; I-2 = 83.4%; AUC = 0.84). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of CEUS were higher than those of conventional US in diagnosing splenic lesions. Contrast-enhanced US is a promising method for accurately diagnosing splenic lesions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?