Comparison of design methods of load-carrying capacity of compressive members of CFST in typical codes worldwide

Ma Xin-Bo,Zhang Su-Mei
2005-01-01
Abstract:The design methods and calculated results of concrete-filled steel circular tubes (CFST) in seven different codes worldwide are compared in detail, which include American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC)-Load and Resistance Factor Design specification for structural steel buildings (LRFD), European Committee for Standardization (CEN) Eurocode 4-Design of composite steel and concrete structures-Part 1.1; General rules and rules for buildings, Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ)-Recommendations for design and construction of concrete filled steel tubular structures, Chinese JCJ 01-89 code, CECS code, DL/T 5085-1999 code and DBJ 13-51-2003 code. The comparisons between the results calculated by each code, under the limitation of parameters, and 658 experimental results collected from worldwide references are carried out, from which the degrees of approach of each codes are tested.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?